Hacker wrote:Roy,
The word "NZ" was used as a synonym for "intolerant" and that is an accurate description of moderators in this forum.
Mind supporting your point of view with some facts?
TIA
Hacker (Moderator)
At first I was really disgusted with the whole attitude toward the leaked beta (discussions are not welcome here, bla-bla-bla) and then you really pissed me off when that other one brutally violated a couple of my messages.
Being pissed off, I called you "intolerant" and "overzealous" which, while not without a merit, might have been a slight exaggeration.
Seriously, I find your performance as moderators inadequate. You are way too visible here (as moderators). Your interference threshold is very low, and your interference methods are improper. You step in on minor occasions and then preach inside someone else's message about nature of the universe. Believe it or not, that tends to piss people off.
You are here not to shape the discussion. Not to filter thoughts. If you want to influence the way a thread is going, get a different nick without the word "Moderator" in it, and then rant your subjective opinion on any subject all you want.
But as a moderator, don't touch anyone's message unless you think it is so bad that it absolutely has to be deleted, and if it is, then delete it without any explanation or way of recourse.
That is a friendly advice. You do of course have a right to do whatever you want, including what you have been doing so far, which will undoubtedly produce many more fascinating threads with historical perspective as the one we have here.