1. The difference, as already mentioned, is only in the Language, the rest is the same.
2. The author of PE Viewer 2.0 is not the only user of his product. I don't remember that in so many years anyone was against such an implementation.
Moderators: white, Hacker, petermad, Stefan2
1. The difference, as already mentioned, is only in the Language, the rest is the same.
First, I'll do the full TypeLib output. What format do you propose? Give me an example.Too bad. It's inconvenient to work with such text.
Give an example of converting REGISTRY to SXS manifest.Could you make an additional node with sxs manifests that will immediately solve the conversion problem
Thanks for the script. I'll look into the problem.VT-DetectionRatio.vbs
Double-clicking will open a browser with the page and copy the link without the error code to the clipboard.Also, when copying the value, the extra text "(E12175) " gets along with the link. Is it possible to exclude it?
The output of version 2.0 is incorrect because only the first record from the record table is output. For example, for StringFileInfo and VarFileInfo structures. In version 3.0 the code is corrected to display all table records.Even if this is the case, the implementation of version 2.0 looks more successful, duplicate blocks are excluded there. Could you delete repeating lines? Language codes can be placed side by side.