to support scripts?

[st]

i always want a couple of commands to be executed in a row. but can only assign a hotkey one command.
writing a AHK script for this seems an option. but what if TC supports this kind of scripting itself

[SanskritFritz]

but what if TC supports this kind of scripting itself

Then we are happy

[sas2000]

 
Very happy
 

[WatchUer]

Very very happy!

[TucknDar]

Very very very ... eh, ok I suppose you all get the idea :p

[st]

i like U guys

[Sam_Zen]

Maybe a stupid remark, because I miss something here , but how about batch-files as a Dos-command ?

[sas2000]

 
We are talking about macros&scripts to do things that can't be done with batch-files.
 

[st]

 
We are talking about macros&scripts to do things that can't be done with batch-files.
 

i didn't know this wiki page. i am a bit into scripts these days.

[frenky]

I would realy like nice macro language within TC.
But after TC is made Unicode (to point this again )

[SanskritFritz]

I would realy like nice macro language within TC

I dont think a new macro language is necessary. What rather counts is a careful export of all accessible functions into a (preferably COM) class model hierarchy, so all scripting languages supporting that model can be used.

[Lefteous]

COM sucks

[SanskritFritz]

I see. No further debate needed in this case.

[majkinetor !]

I dont think a new macro language is necessary. What rather counts is a careful export of all accessible functions into a (preferably COM) class model hierarchy, so all scripting languages supporting that model can be used.

COM sucks

Everything is better then not having scripting possibilities. I also don't like complications intruduced as side-effects of COM programming, but this job can also be done easier today with C templates or similiar. I have example of creating shell extensions where COM is totally transparent.

But enough of this talk... this is not going to happen anyway.