I frequently copy large volumes of data. The other day, for example, I had to copy the entire user area (a whopping 23Gb) to a removable hard drive to cover user needs on an off-server-site location. The task was a colossal one as you can imagine since all shorts of problems like weird file names and files in use by applications, users, and network resources were causing problems in the coping process.
The whole process lasted from 8pm till 1am next day with my presence necessary in order to interact with the error messages. It wasn’t vital to have every single file copied as the completion of the task was more important (due to the tight deadline), than achieving an identical duplicate backup of the user area. So, skipping and/or ignoring copied data was the technique to follow in order to complete the task.
Of course in the long run, I wanted to have this copy updated to an identical duplicate due to the importance of some data. What someone can easily do in this case is to use TC to compare and synchronize the two locations but even then problematic files cause similar problems. Not to mention also that performing this synchronization a couple of weeks later can be confusing since the two locations were being used and updated simultaneously and separately (on-site and off-site users.)
It would be nice if TC could produce a report after coping is complete if and only if errors occur in order to help us the network administrators in similar situations. Being able to see this report as well as save it in text form, for example, can be very useful. Of course the report could include the typical information like source and destination locations, dates, the problematic files and the type of errors on the whole process. In reality this report could just be a capture of all the error messages TC produces.
I could have asked to be able to save the list shown on the synchronization window but this will not include only the ‘problematic” files but newly created ones also. Not to mention that some problems were the outcome of files being in use by system resources at the time of the coping process so there was no real problem with the integrity of those files.
I would appreciate any suggestions here concerning this feature or even a procedure to tackle this (you could say logical) problem YOU follow in similar situations. Thanx!
Kind regards,
Panos
PS: As an extension of the above… why not include an “Ignore All Types of Errors” button so that someone can perform the whole copying process without the need of user interaction with TC. I guess this should definitely be followed by a report just to be on the safe side!
