What about porting 32-bit TC to Lazarus?

Here you can propose new features, make suggestions etc.

Moderators: Stefan2, white, sheep, Hacker

User avatar
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 377
Joined: 2013-09-04, 14:07 UTC

Post by *elgonzo » 2013-10-16, 22:05 UTC

Horst.Epp wrote:
ghisler(Author) wrote:Many companies still use Windows 9x or even 3.1, mainly on standalone machines - simply because there are no drivers for newer Windows versions.
But they can stay with a old TC version
as there are no new functions needed on such environments.
I wholeheartedly agree and i don't want to spoil your soup.
But, well, i will spoil your soup: Even Intel could not get rid of the dreaded ancient A20 gate. It is still there in some form in current chip-sets. That should tell us something... :cry:

Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 50
Joined: 2007-07-18, 12:21 UTC

Re: What about porting 32-bit TC to Lazarus?

Post by *cubic » 2019-07-15, 15:00 UTC

So, was TC ported to Lazarus in the end?
I would like to switch to Lazarus too.

User avatar
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 37475
Joined: 2003-02-04, 09:46 UTC
Location: Switzerland

Re: What about porting 32-bit TC to Lazarus?

Post by *ghisler(Author) » 2019-07-18, 09:36 UTC

Why should I? The Lazarus version is much larger.
Author of Total Commander

Post Reply