Current item highlighting in the last active panel
Moderators: Hacker, petermad, Stefan2, white
- Balderstrom
- Power Member
- Posts: 2148
- Joined: 2005-10-11, 10:10 UTC
TwinKey in it's early versions was quite unstable. At this point in time though, if it has caused any TC crashes then there's been very few of them. On a very slow machine 5+ years old, you may notice some slowdown in scrolling or flickering in the file panels... Other than that --- not so much.
There's quite a few enhancements of TwinKey that I find indispensible,
1) Automated Views for specific directories by path.
2) Ability to apply background images (automatic: think MP3 Artist folders).
3) Colored tabs, icons on tabs (can be automatic, based on folder path)
4) Sticky Files.
5) Inactive cursor highlight.
Among a handful of other features.
Whether someone wants to consider it a hack, that is certainly their perogative. I think it's a shame that TC has languished in basic usability that has prompted so many "hacks", scripts and external fixes to get around TC's quirks and limitations.
There's quite a few enhancements of TwinKey that I find indispensible,
1) Automated Views for specific directories by path.
2) Ability to apply background images (automatic: think MP3 Artist folders).
3) Colored tabs, icons on tabs (can be automatic, based on folder path)
4) Sticky Files.
5) Inactive cursor highlight.
Among a handful of other features.
Whether someone wants to consider it a hack, that is certainly their perogative. I think it's a shame that TC has languished in basic usability that has prompted so many "hacks", scripts and external fixes to get around TC's quirks and limitations.
Okay you can construct a reason for this special case (I assume you are using a parameter like %P%N %T%M).chrizoo wrote:There is definitely an undeniable and objective advantage to know what the current file in the inactive pane is....HolgerK wrote:I still see no real advantage for this inactive panel cursor.
May be hard to find for an non inverting cursor.chrizoo wrote:(Aside from being optional) the user can choose a very unobtrusive color schemeHolgerK wrote:An additional cursor in the inactive panel can be confusing
BTW: did you realize that billiebubs suggestions was primarily about the cursor of the active panel of an inactive (non focused / background) TC?HolgerK wrote:But i should shut up, because I said "it's no option for me".
Thread titles alone can be confusing

Regards
Holger
Everything I have written above is true, I didn't construct anything.HolgerK wrote:Okay you can construct a reason for this special case
what?May be hard to find for an non inverting cursor.
no, I have missed that indeed. If I'm talking about a completely different thing, I should start a new thread.BTW: did you realize that billiebubs suggestions was primarily about the cursor of the active panel of an inactive (non focused / background) TC?
^
I never wrote "significantly different color", but almost the opposite:
I never wrote "significantly different color", but almost the opposite:
(Aside from being optional) the user can choose a very unobtrusive color scheme (i.e. one that almost matches the background color), so that it's not visually distracting, but when you expressly look for it you can still (barely, but without problems) find it.
Holgerk wrote:For me is the cursor a clear indicator for "Here is the source panel".
HolgerK wrote:With very bad default colors with aero.ts4242 wrote:We already have ActiveTitle and InactiveTitle for that purpose
Without a significant different cursor it's harder to distinguish source and target panel.chrizoo wrote:I never wrote "significantly different color", but almost the opposite
Regards
Holger
huhm ??
I thought we're talking about a cursor which does NOT EXIST currently (no distinction at all). So NOTHING can be "harder to distinguish" than "no distinction at all", right?
This discussion is so painful (not your fault), because image embedding is not allowed on this board and without that it's like blind people talking about color.
I thought we're talking about a cursor which does NOT EXIST currently (no distinction at all). So NOTHING can be "harder to distinguish" than "no distinction at all", right?
This discussion is so painful (not your fault), because image embedding is not allowed on this board and without that it's like blind people talking about color.
- Balderstrom
- Power Member
- Posts: 2148
- Joined: 2005-10-11, 10:10 UTC
The cursor is in neither place until TC regains focus, but when it does, the Active/Source Panel will be on the left side on the file: _TMPWD.out_, whereas the Target Panel (right side) will be on the file: TC_EmptyDirsDELETE.ahk.
Image: http://img594.imageshack.us/img594/1450/tcscreenshot.pngchrizoo wrote:(Aside from being optional) the user can choose a very unobtrusive color scheme (i.e. one that almost matches the background color), so that it's not visually distracting, but when you expressly look for it you can still (barely, but without problems) find it.
Sigh.chrizoo wrote:Image: http://img594.imageshack.us/img594/1450/tcscreenshot.png
RegardsHolgerK wrote:May be hard to find for an non inverting cursor.chrizoo wrote:(Aside from being optional) the user can choose a very unobtrusive color schemeHolgerK wrote:An additional cursor in the inactive panel can be confusing
HolgerK wrote:But i should shut up, because I said "it's no option for me".
Holger