The height of the edit file name in more than 7.56a
Moderators: Hacker, petermad, Stefan2, white
The height of the edit file name in more than 7.56a
The height of the edit file name in more than 7.56a. The next line is partially closed by this edit field.
80b3 x64:
Image: http://gora.7zsfx.info/test/80b3.png
756a:
Image: http://gora.7zsfx.info/test/756.png
Win7 x64.
80b3 x64:
Image: http://gora.7zsfx.info/test/80b3.png
756a:
Image: http://gora.7zsfx.info/test/756.png
Win7 x64.
8.0ß 64-bit Inline rename edit box higher than in v7.56a
Hello, gora.
This has been reported before. Please, have a look at this thread and at the posted screenshots, too: [x64]Gap at Beginning of Filename Rename.
The thread is not only about a little gap in front of the filename, but also about the height of the edit box.
Kind regards,
Karl
This has been reported before. Please, have a look at this thread and at the posted screenshots, too: [x64]Gap at Beginning of Filename Rename.
The thread is not only about a little gap in front of the filename, but also about the height of the edit box.
Kind regards,
Karl
- ghisler(Author)
- Site Admin
- Posts: 50532
- Joined: 2003-02-04, 09:46 UTC
- Location: Switzerland
- Contact:
Unfortunately I could not find any reason for this extra space in the Lazarus sources so far. TC itself isn't requesting it.
Author of Total Commander
https://www.ghisler.com
https://www.ghisler.com
I cannot confirm this. Here 8.0β4 32-bit has the same inplace rename box sizes as 7.56a had.flm404 wrote:32bit version of tc is also affected, so i think it's not a problem in Lazarus.
Flint's Homepage: Full TC Russification Package, VirtualDisk, NTFS Links, NoClose Replacer, and other stuff!
Using TC 11.03 / Win10 x64
Using TC 11.03 / Win10 x64
Confirm on TC 8.0b4 x32 too.
http://www.imagebam.com/image/86a3bf153009371
http://www.imagebam.com/image/86a3bf153009371
The past was yesterday...
TC 9.50ß6 64 Bit, #116718 Personal licence
TC 9.50ß6 64 Bit, #116718 Personal licence
It's strange... Here is my screenshot (i've posted it on russian forum, so you probably seen it already):Flint wrote:I cannot confirm this. Here 8.0β4 32-bit has the same inplace rename box sizes as 7.56a had.flm404 wrote:32bit version of tc is also affected, so i think it's not a problem in Lazarus.
http://simplest-image-hosting.net/png-0-image3133
SFMBE (Sorry for my bad english)
Yes, I saw it, but here's what I have on my computer:flm404 wrote:Here is my screenshot (i've posted it on russian forum, so you probably seen it already):
http://flint-inc.ru/Temp/tcbeta80/inplace_rename.png
I noticed that on your screenshot version 8.0 also has increased height for tab headers, panel header, drive combobox. Do you have different options for 8.0 and 7.56a? If yes, please, try them with the same wincmd.ini.
Flint's Homepage: Full TC Russification Package, VirtualDisk, NTFS Links, NoClose Replacer, and other stuff!
Using TC 11.03 / Win10 x64
Using TC 11.03 / Win10 x64
- ghisler(Author)
- Site Admin
- Posts: 50532
- Joined: 2003-02-04, 09:46 UTC
- Location: Switzerland
- Contact:
That's indeed an interesting observation! It's strange that a different font is used to measure the edit box then for displaying the text...
Author of Total Commander
https://www.ghisler.com
https://www.ghisler.com
Though history.txt tells
I still have larger rename boxes in 64-bit version than in 32-bit version.13.10.11 Fixed: In place rename box had larger border, which was controlled by the main window font instead of the listbox font (32/64)
Flint's Homepage: Full TC Russification Package, VirtualDisk, NTFS Links, NoClose Replacer, and other stuff!
Using TC 11.03 / Win10 x64
Using TC 11.03 / Win10 x64