Hi Paul
your link should rather look like this:
Code: Select all
http://kobi.virtualplastic.net/progs/index.html
sheepdog
Moderators: Hacker, petermad, Stefan2, white
Code: Select all
http://kobi.virtualplastic.net/progs/index.html
Start TC with 'runas' and set up before a few users with appropriate names, so you can distinguish between the different TCs.AlleyKat wrote:I often get around it by opening Yet Another TC (or 2) for this. And remembering which is which and for what...
I just want to be able to change the first few letters of that titleline so I got something more to go on than [2], [3] etc.
I had got it.Lefteous wrote:I still don't understand why people are angry about my obviously funny ment postings. I didn't want to destroy the thread, I just wanted to make it more entertaining for just 2 posts.
is so extremely polemical and depreciative that this is the end of the discussion about legal or illegal. What else could I tell you to prove that you are wrong if not the laws? I have no idea, sorry.and interprete them the way you like
I'm not sure if I understood this correctly. You are using a crack, but not wanna use a "3rd party app". Is there a reason why you prefer cracks?But indeed, this thread is not suited to argue about cracks but it's my only chance to use them 'cause I neither want to use 3rd party apps to fix TC nor do I wanna use stupid tricks like "window moving". I am using TC maximized and have no use for such silly "workarounds".
This could be done by just one "titlebar painter". In addition the described situation is hypothetical, because I don't think you have a dozen of those applications.Imagine I had a dozen apps like Total Commander with my registered real name in title bar. Do you think it would be a reasonable solution to run a dozen 3rd party titlebar painters permanently?
That's true of course, although I don't think your power bill will increase because of a "caption painter", only if the programm is written really bad.A crack is a 3rd party app, right, but it doesn't waste cpu cycles which result in higher power bills, it doesn't waste space on my desktop, my systray, my taskmanager, whereever. It does its job ONCE and it's all good.
Sure, nevertheless it's one app I have no use for 'cause it wastes my resources.This could be done by just one "titlebar painter".
Does that matter? I think one application acting like that is enough, thank God other developers are not that stubborn.In addition the described situation is hypothetical, because I don't think you have a dozen of those applications.
It needs CPU cycles I could save if I wouldn't run the program.although I don't think your power bill will increase because of a "caption painter", only if the programm is written really bad.
Well, I am old enough to take the risk. I have seen some crafted trojans here that aren't detected by any AV app (Kaspersky safe) as long as noone mails them to the AV companies (there is no working heuristic) and of course noone will because it's for "academic use only" so I know that there is no safety when running executables anyway, be it a crack or be it a "virus checked by author" application.Remember the crack will change your Totalcmd.exe executable and who knows what it does in addition to change your titlebar or did you write the crack?
Easy there!!!icfu wrote:...thank God other developers are not that stubborn.
I agree pdavit. Christian is indeed a good example of a developer who really cares and takes into consideration the opinions of TC's users. I must say here i disagree with him occasionally and i would like to see into TC some of my (and other user's) ideas he has rejected, but he has set his rules on the way he works and i respect them because in general, i like TC very much. After all, we can't have everything in this world...pdavit wrote:Easy there!!!icfu wrote:...thank God other developers are not that stubborn.
On the contrary; I consider Christian totally open-minded. Not to mention that developers that communicate with users are a rare breed!
I’m not kissing a_s here. A comparison between wish requests in this forum and TC itself can only verify the correctiveness of my aforementioned comment over Christian.
I fully agree, although I disagree here I respect the authors opinion. Some people here on the board don't respect anyone, not even the author, at all. I guess these people are getting very nice emails from the author and other board members.Christian is indeed a good example of a developer who really cares and takes into consideration the opinions of TC's users. I must say here i disagree with him occasionally and i would like to see into TC some of my (and other user's) ideas he has rejected, but he has set his rules on the way he works and i respect them because in general, i like TC very much. After all, we can't have everything in this world...
I agree. Some time ago I even suggested to the authors of another indispensable tool of mine that they could start a forum like the Total Commander Forum. This way the user community could share experience and participate in the development process more easily. Unfortunately they replied that they don't have such plans currently.wanderer wrote:I agree pdavit. Christian is indeed a good example of a developer who really cares and takes into consideration the opinions of TC's users. I must say here i disagree with him occasionally and i would like to see into TC some of my (and other user's) ideas he has rejected, but he has set his rules on the way he works and i respect them because in general, i like TC very much. After all, we can't have everything in this world...