ShellExecute instead of executing the associated file directly?

English support forum

Moderators: Hacker, petermad, Stefan2, white

User avatar
Dalai
Power Member
Power Member
Posts: 9974
Joined: 2005-01-28, 22:17 UTC
Location: Meiningen (Südthüringen)

Re: ShellExecute instead of executing the associated file directly?

Post by *Dalai »

2Usher
The .png files linked by elgonzo both display just fine here.

Regards
Dalai
#101164 Personal licence
Ryzen 5 2600, 16 GiB RAM, ASUS Prime X370-A, Win7 x64

Plugins: Services2, Startups, CertificateInfo, SignatureInfo, LineBreakInfo - Download-Mirror
gdpr deleted 6
Power Member
Power Member
Posts: 872
Joined: 2013-09-04, 14:07 UTC

Re: ShellExecute instead of executing the associated file directly?

Post by *gdpr deleted 6 »

Usher wrote: 2021-03-18, 14:49 UTC 2elgonzo
Linking to a non-existing image (png in this case) either displays "404 Not found" or a folder using that name (which runs all the bells-and-whistles).
Weird, like Dalei, when i click on the links in my post i get the images (even using a browser in a VM that could not possibly have the images in its browser cache). I wonder whether there might be some unusual browser plug-in(s) or proxy setup on your end that screws things up. I guess if we want to continue this discussion, perhaps a @moderator could move this imgur discussion into a separate thread.
User avatar
Usher
Power Member
Power Member
Posts: 1726
Joined: 2011-03-11, 10:11 UTC

Re: ShellExecute instead of executing the associated file directly?

Post by *Usher »

There may be some javascript glitch, deliberately broken for Firefox. EOT for me now. Thanks for help.
Andrzej P. Wozniak
Polish subforum moderator
Post Reply