DarkCryptTC - Total Commander now is the best encryptor!!!
Moderators: Hacker, petermad, Stefan2, white
- alexanderwdark
- Senior Member
- Posts: 270
- Joined: 2008-04-14, 07:20 UTC
- Location: Russia
- Contact:
- alexanderwdark
- Senior Member
- Posts: 270
- Joined: 2008-04-14, 07:20 UTC
- Location: Russia
- Contact:
14.12.2008 Implemented GOST block cipher (Russian GOST 28147-89) with 256 bit Skein hash key and original strong CB RF SBOX, also Triple-GOST in EDE3 block encryption mode (such as in 3DES), RSA-GOST EDE3.
DarkCryptTC II
DarkCrypt GUI
DarkCryptTC II
DarkCrypt GUI
- alexanderwdark
- Senior Member
- Posts: 270
- Joined: 2008-04-14, 07:20 UTC
- Location: Russia
- Contact:
14.12.2008 Option to store fake filename. Now, you can disable file hashing and file name storing.
DarkCryptTC II
DarkCrypt GUI
DarkCryptTC II
DarkCrypt GUI
- alexanderwdark
- Senior Member
- Posts: 270
- Joined: 2008-04-14, 07:20 UTC
- Location: Russia
- Contact:
16.12.2008 1. Add. implementation on new engine: Rijndael-128 (128 bit block), KASUMI-b (block cipher mode, CBC), CAST-128, CAST-256. 2. Cipher list now auto-sorted.
DarkCryptTC II
DarkCrypt GUI
DarkCryptTC II
DarkCrypt GUI
Hi alexanderwdark,
There's a new version on totalcmd.net:
"wcx_darkcrypt_tc3_2008.12.18_v3.rar"
is it yours?
I've seen earlier talks about virus reports, so far i had no problem with that.
But with this latest version my McAfee VirusScan Enterprise reports "Generic Downloader.x" on xdc.exe.
Any ideas?
There's a new version on totalcmd.net:
"wcx_darkcrypt_tc3_2008.12.18_v3.rar"
is it yours?
I've seen earlier talks about virus reports, so far i had no problem with that.
But with this latest version my McAfee VirusScan Enterprise reports "Generic Downloader.x" on xdc.exe.
Any ideas?
Calvin
-----------------
Disclaimer: Any errors in spelling, tact, or fact are transmission errors.
-----------------
Disclaimer: Any errors in spelling, tact, or fact are transmission errors.
- alexanderwdark
- Senior Member
- Posts: 270
- Joined: 2008-04-14, 07:20 UTC
- Location: Russia
- Contact:
This is very stupis problem of some Antivirus Software, some of delphi code + upx packer gives this result. I think, scan engines are not so good to exclude this buggy detections. As a fix, someone can send file to it's AV lab.Calvin wrote:Hi alexanderwdark,
There's a new version on totalcmd.net:
"wcx_darkcrypt_tc3_2008.12.18_v3.rar"
is it yours?
I've seen earlier talks about virus reports, so far i had no problem with that.
But with this latest version my McAfee VirusScan Enterprise reports "Generic Downloader.x" on xdc.exe.
Any ideas?
- alexanderwdark
- Senior Member
- Posts: 270
- Joined: 2008-04-14, 07:20 UTC
- Location: Russia
- Contact:
My DrWeb hasn't this problem. Kaspersky has. Avira too.alexanderwdark wrote:This is very distressing problem of some Antivirus Software, some of delphi code + upx packer = signature collision or heuristic core engine failure that gives this result. I think, scan engines are not so good to exclude this buggy detections. As a fix, someone can send file to it's AV lab.Calvin wrote:Hi alexanderwdark,
There's a new version on totalcmd.net:
"wcx_darkcrypt_tc3_2008.12.18_v3.rar"
is it yours?
I've seen earlier talks about virus reports, so far i had no problem with that.
But with this latest version my McAfee VirusScan Enterprise reports "Generic Downloader.x" on xdc.exe.
Any ideas?
- alexanderwdark
- Senior Member
- Posts: 270
- Joined: 2008-04-14, 07:20 UTC
- Location: Russia
- Contact:
- alexanderwdark
- Senior Member
- Posts: 270
- Joined: 2008-04-14, 07:20 UTC
- Location: Russia
- Contact:
- alexanderwdark
- Senior Member
- Posts: 270
- Joined: 2008-04-14, 07:20 UTC
- Location: Russia
- Contact:
- alexanderwdark
- Senior Member
- Posts: 270
- Joined: 2008-04-14, 07:20 UTC
- Location: Russia
- Contact:
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 350
- Joined: 2005-08-13, 15:13 UTC
- Location: Berlin, Germany
- Contact:
- alexanderwdark
- Senior Member
- Posts: 270
- Joined: 2008-04-14, 07:20 UTC
- Location: Russia
- Contact:
Some AV's are buggy or have buggy engines/bases... It's needed to send so incorrectly "detected" files to AV lab, they must fix this errors..TychoBarfy wrote:2alexanderwdark,
AVG tells me at any version of xdc.exe, it would be infected by a Trojan called Downloader.Banload.AGHP.
Is there anything to fear of it?
which algorithm?
Hi alexanderwdark,
I intend to test and use of your nice-looking plugin.Before I go into deep encryption theory I am interesting in which algorithm is best of best ones accordingly to you (discussed AES Rijndael?).
I mean from point of view aspects such as unbreakable by any method and fast e.g. not consuming lots of computing resources.Thanks for good reference
I intend to test and use of your nice-looking plugin.Before I go into deep encryption theory I am interesting in which algorithm is best of best ones accordingly to you (discussed AES Rijndael?).
I mean from point of view aspects such as unbreakable by any method and fast e.g. not consuming lots of computing resources.Thanks for good reference
- alexanderwdark
- Senior Member
- Posts: 270
- Joined: 2008-04-14, 07:20 UTC
- Location: Russia
- Contact:
Re: which algorithm?
dpl wrote:Hi alexanderwdark,
I intend to test and use of your nice-looking plugin.Before I go into deep encryption theory I am interesting in which algorithm is best of best ones accordingly to you (discussed AES Rijndael?).
I mean from point of view aspects such as unbreakable by any method and fast e.g. not consuming lots of computing resources.Thanks for good reference
There are best block ciphers implemented:
Twofish, Serpent, Rijndael, Blowfish, Camellia, IDEA NXT, Anubis, RC6, GOST, SEED, MARS, SAFER++, CAST-256.
I like Serpent and Twofish, AES is also good choise. But there are also lot of secure ciphers (such as DEAL, Triple DES, IDEA, Noekeon, SCHACAL 2, etc.), including some stream ones.
RC6 is fast and secure, perfect choise.
Now you can add custom implementation (put dll with block api interface in block api directory).