Breadcrumbs, Scripts, etc.

English support forum

Moderators: Hacker, petermad, Stefan2, white

User avatar
Sombra
Power Member
Power Member
Posts: 814
Joined: 2005-12-27, 22:23 UTC
Location: Zaragoza, Spain

Post by *Sombra »

/MODE "OT" ON

sas2000 wrote:
BTW have you seen icfu new avatar, close to heresy Wink Exclamation .
Hi sas2000,
Watch the icfus's avatar from DOpus Resource centre :roll: :lol:

/MODE "OT" OFF
I can read English, but... I write like Tarzan. (sorry)
User avatar
StickyNomad
Power Member
Power Member
Posts: 1933
Joined: 2004-01-10, 00:15 UTC
Location: Germany

Post by *StickyNomad »

Hehe, kind of a cross-promotion, I'd say :wink:
User avatar
Clo
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 5731
Joined: 2003-12-02, 19:01 UTC
Location: Bordeaux, France
Contact:

Jeff's humour

Post by *Clo »

2Sombra

:) Hello J M !

:lol: Quite the Jeff's humour style… :P

:mrgreen: KR
Claude
Clo
#31505 Traducteur Français de TC French translator Aide en Français Tutoriels Français English Tutorials
User avatar
sas2000
Power Member
Power Member
Posts: 682
Joined: 2003-02-07, 04:32 UTC
Location: Galiza

Post by *sas2000 »

 
If you wanna test DO9 new features for 60 days here it is.

For me, after 7 years using Tc it'll be impossible to migrate to DO.
 
User avatar
JohnFredC
Power Member
Power Member
Posts: 886
Joined: 2003-03-14, 13:37 UTC
Location: Sarasota Florida

Post by *JohnFredC »

Just to set the record straight. My purpose in starting this thread was to promote discussion of possible features and enhancements for future versions of TC (such as "breadcrumbs" and rename scripts), not to promote another tools.
Licensed, Mouse-Centric, moving (slowly) toward Touch-centric
User avatar
StickyNomad
Power Member
Power Member
Posts: 1933
Joined: 2004-01-10, 00:15 UTC
Location: Germany

Post by *StickyNomad »

2JohnFredC

I didn't think you've started this thread for promotion purposes. I just referred to icfu's avatars when I said 'cross-promotion' :)
User avatar
Stance
Power Member
Power Member
Posts: 1079
Joined: 2005-03-29, 06:26 UTC

Post by *Stance »

2JohnFredC
Almost all features that are now realised in DO9 was suggested in the TC forum before.
[REQ] Breadcrumb navigation in "current directory"
I am sure you will find a suitable thread for "rename scripts" when searching.
User avatar
ghisler(Author)
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 50475
Joined: 2003-02-04, 09:46 UTC
Location: Switzerland
Contact:

Post by *ghisler(Author) »

Well, I haven't seen much use in that "breadcrumb" bar because I use mainly the keyboard in Total Commander to navigate through directories, not the mouse. Even for mouse users, I doubt that it is that useful in a 2 panel file manager like Total Commander. The separate "buttons" and dropdowns per path take a lot of screen space, so it really makes sense only if there is enough screen space. In Explorer with a single file panel, this isn't really a problem.
Author of Total Commander
https://www.ghisler.com
User avatar
Stance
Power Member
Power Member
Posts: 1079
Joined: 2005-03-29, 06:26 UTC

Post by *Stance »

Vista and its explorer has got some great new enhancements:
-Use checkmarks for the marking of files
-Saving Searches by creating virtual folders
-Breadcrumb navigation bar

The use of these features will become standard for new customers.
Don't need to mention here that most users love to navigate by using the mouse and some may have a monitor with plenty of screen space.

I would like to have an option when TC is installed in Vista, asking me to replace the "Current directory" with Explorers breadcrumb navigation bar.
User avatar
Hacker
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 13142
Joined: 2003-02-06, 14:56 UTC
Location: Bratislava, Slovakia

Post by *Hacker »

Christian,
I doubt that it is that useful in a 2 panel file manager like Total Commander. The separate "buttons" and dropdowns per path take a lot of screen space
As far as I understood it they are only visible until you find the desired directory. Just like the Windows Start menu only takes up space until you click the program you want to run.

Roman
Mal angenommen, du drückst Strg+F, wählst die FTP-Verbindung (mit gespeichertem Passwort), klickst aber nicht auf Verbinden, sondern fällst tot um.
User avatar
Lefteous
Power Member
Power Member
Posts: 9536
Joined: 2003-02-09, 01:18 UTC
Location: Germany
Contact:

Post by *Lefteous »

Breadcrumb or not the "currect directory" element could be improved. The first thing to improve would be a convenient way to see the whole path even if there is not enough space. I think for this field a way to horizontally scroll the path would be the best solution.
I also like the idea of making each path element a drag&drop target.
User avatar
Stance
Power Member
Power Member
Posts: 1079
Joined: 2005-03-29, 06:26 UTC

Post by *Stance »

Lefteous wrote:The first thing to improve would be a convenient way to see the whole path even if there is not enough space.
There could be an option to show only one navigation bar for the active panel.
Another option could offer to show both navigation bars underneath each other.

Maybe implemented in DO10 :twisted:
User avatar
Lefteous
Power Member
Power Member
Posts: 9536
Joined: 2003-02-09, 01:18 UTC
Location: Germany
Contact:

Post by *Lefteous »

2Stance
Maybe I didn't write this clear enough. I ment showing _another_ part of the path not the whole path at once. For the whole path more space is required. A solution is required _without_ using more space.
User avatar
m^2
Power Member
Power Member
Posts: 1413
Joined: 2006-07-12, 10:02 UTC
Location: Poland
Contact:

Post by *m^2 »

Lefteous wrote:I also like the idea of making each path element a drag&drop target.
So do I.
User avatar
StickyNomad
Power Member
Power Member
Posts: 1933
Joined: 2004-01-10, 00:15 UTC
Location: Germany

Post by *StickyNomad »

2Lefteous
I think for this field a way to horizontally scroll the path would be the best solution.
I agree, this would indeed be useful. I could think of two commands cm_scrollPathfieldLeft/-Right, perhaps plus two (optional) tiny scrollbuttons at the right side of the path field.
I also like the idea of making each path element a drag&drop target.
I also agree on this one. I think a slight highlighting of the currently targeted part of the path would be mandatory then, so you can see where the file will be dropped. And to go further, if the path is too wide to fit into the path field, it could perhaps even be scrolled automatically if you drag a file to a partly visible path part.
Post Reply