Re: ZIPFROMLIST: suggestion for a new parameter
Posted: 2023-07-03, 04:51 UTC
Sure, that would have been like cm_Copy or cm_RenMov.ghisler(Author) wrote: 2023-06-29, 09:09 UTC Thanks for suggesting it! I was considering using -o1..-o9, but this would collide with -0..-9 for the compression when used together in one parameter.
I think -oX is still a good choice. I actually prefer a "meaningful" character (like n for "newer", etc.) for X over a digit for this particular option.
And more overwrite options can still be added through new characters in the future...
BTW: I have used the new options quite often during the past days and everything worked smoothly.
Thank you again for adding!