Non-modal search window
Moderators: Hacker, petermad, Stefan2, white
Christian,
OK, well, then back to suggestion 1b)
The search window would become modeless after the search is invoked and only if search in archives is disabled. So the modality would depend on the search in archives checkbox.
Would that be possible?
Roman
OK, well, then back to suggestion 1b)
The search window would become modeless after the search is invoked and only if search in archives is disabled. So the modality would depend on the search in archives checkbox.
Would that be possible?
Roman
Mal angenommen, du drückst Strg+F, wählst die FTP-Verbindung (mit gespeichertem Passwort), klickst aber nicht auf Verbinden, sondern fällst tot um.
- SanskritFritz
- Power Member
- Posts: 3693
- Joined: 2003-07-24, 09:25 UTC
- Location: Budapest, Hungary
- mikscomputers
- Junior Member
- Posts: 2
- Joined: 2005-07-13, 10:51 UTC
- Location: SCG, Europe
- Contact:
- ghisler(Author)
- Site Admin
- Posts: 50383
- Joined: 2003-02-04, 09:46 UTC
- Location: Switzerland
- Contact:
This would be possible, but then "feed to listbox" would become impossible when the user started copying in some other dirs...The search window would become modeless after the search is invoked and only if search in archives is disabled. So the modality would depend on the search in archives checkbox.
Author of Total Commander
https://www.ghisler.com
https://www.ghisler.com
Christian,
Roman
Would it be possible to disable Feed to listbox during that copying (or any other blocking operation) and reenabling it when the operation finishes (or is sent to background)?but then "feed to listbox" would become impossible when the user started copying in some other dirs...
Roman
Mal angenommen, du drückst Strg+F, wählst die FTP-Verbindung (mit gespeichertem Passwort), klickst aber nicht auf Verbinden, sondern fällst tot um.
- ghisler(Author)
- Site Admin
- Posts: 50383
- Joined: 2003-02-04, 09:46 UTC
- Location: Switzerland
- Contact:
Hmm, difficult - I could detect when there is a modal dialog box, but some situations like a slow ftp server couldn't be detected this way...
Author of Total Commander
https://www.ghisler.com
https://www.ghisler.com
-
- Junior Member
- Posts: 23
- Joined: 2003-03-07, 23:27 UTC
- Location: San Francisco, US
- Contact:
I really want to see a background search feature too. A search typically takes a long time. Often I want to keep on working while this run in the background. I sometimes have to use the Windows search for this. Launching another instance of TC has its issue because the tabs aren't replicated.
The issue with external packer sounds minor to me. Some smart coding to serialize the request should work. If not making background search and search in archive exclusive should be a minor UI tweak.
The issue with external packer sounds minor to me. Some smart coding to serialize the request should work. If not making background search and search in archive exclusive should be a minor UI tweak.
Totaly agree with this.. Enable it in hidden features for users familiar with problem as someone said. What happen with this request in last 3years nobody came up with solution?Hacker wrote:OK, well, then back to suggestion 1b)
The search window would become modeless after the search is invoked and only if search in archives is disabled. So the modality would depend on the search in archives checkbox.

- ghisler(Author)
- Site Admin
- Posts: 50383
- Joined: 2003-02-04, 09:46 UTC
- Location: Switzerland
- Contact:
See my second post, I already wrote that "I'm sorry but this is technically impossible".
Author of Total Commander
https://www.ghisler.com
https://www.ghisler.com
-
- Junior Member
- Posts: 8
- Joined: 2004-04-15, 02:25 UTC
I think it is ralizedable at least as background/joblist simillary to this thread.
I've been thinking about this for a long time. Couldn't the two instances of TC (calling and searching) share a memory space for just this kind of functionality? Perhaps with an interprocess message consisting of a handle to the results file list structure and an instruction word to tell the originating instance what to do with it...?ghisler(Author) wrote:but then "feed to listbox" would no longer be possible.
Licensed, Mouse-Centric, moving (slowly) toward Touch-centric