![Wink ;)](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
BG transparency is no replacement for an image unless the app behind is the running desktop but...
Icfu
Moderators: Hacker, petermad, Stefan2, white
Eh eh. Funny question.so why we are using windows instead of dos?
Oh it does.Implementing optional background images doesn't hurt those who have no use for it
Sure. There are other, more important things waiting to be implemented.or you have other reasons against that feature in general, please explain
You speak like you know TC code in detailsicfu wrote:1. Implementing optional background images doesn't hurt those who have no use for it, so it is a constructive feature request.
2. Denying the need of optional background images hurts those who have a use for it without resulting in anything postive for those you have no use for it, so it is a destructive request.
If you can offer a workaround that equals this feature request or you have other reasons against that feature in general, please explain but without using "ghisler language" like "will make TC slower", "doesn't work on 16 Bit windows", "my cat is ill", etc...
Many applications support BG images, so there must be some really brave developers and users out there. Life is a risk and sooner or later ends, I can accept that.You know that displaying an image isn't a safe task (see wmfallowed key?), so supporting BG images will sooner or later require additional sequrity releases