I agree. SC also supports persistent tree visibility status by folder tab, a folder tab-based GUI for virtual folders, and named panel layouts. User interface innovations and efficiencies aside, however, in use SC seems somewhat slow compared to TC for day-to-day file operations and AFAIK doesn't yet support custom column configs.SpeedProject guys are really cool
Slightly humorous to me is how the "breadcrumbs" GUI paradigm is touted as "new". I have encountered (and written) similar GUI mechanisms in database inquiry interfaces (for example) in the past. Maybe some file manager developers are finally waking up to the fact that file managers are just tools to manage file data.
There are many efficiencies for managing lists of data implemented in spreadsheet and datasheet GUIs that would benefit file management tools like TC or SC or any of the others.
Imagine the TC lister offering the kind of flexibility and interactivity of an Excel spreadsheet, for instance. Lockable (for scrolling) columns & rows, direct manipulation of attributes & comments, formulaic columns in the lister, etc. These are conventional/universal paradigms for data manipulation that many users are already comfortable with and would make use of immediately.
I'd pay Dopus prices for that!