I can not imagine how this shared cachelist must work,when 2 types of hash used simultaneously. Is it safe?byblo wrote:* md5 should share the unique cachelist with crc32 and maybe future types (to also avoid multiple log files).
How it will be better?byblo wrote:* There are too much entries now, and some of them need to be merged or deleted (like a new detection type at once : md5/sfv/tagsfv/tagmd5/nfs/ect...). It was a mess since the beginning then I will remade them when I can (It is planned to also add ed2k file id, someday...)
Oh, I`m really sorry. Thats why my second nickname is Lamer.byblo wrote:* The sources are free, but please don't use them to release something that looks "official", when it is not the case Latest version remain 0.22b, not 0.25b.
Do you meen that if I share a thing that using sourcecode made by other programmer I must give other name to the project? What I must do?