size progress for single file transfer

Only forum where polls are allowed. You may announce a new poll in the matching support forum.

Moderators: white, sheep, Hacker, Stefan2

Post Reply

What do you think?

I support it
19
66%
I dont agree
3
10%
Uninterested
7
24%
 
Total votes: 29

User avatar
Idea
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 12
Joined: 2012-06-23, 17:32 UTC

size progress for single file transfer

Post by *Idea » 2012-06-23, 18:34 UTC

Hi all, I use Windows Commander since 1999

Code: Select all

28.08.11 Added: Show number of bytes handled and total bytes when copying, packing, unpacking
It was a great innovation, but my guess that would be better if it appears for single and not only at multiple file transfers. Could be useful for a huge file and also at relatively smaller size with slow transfer.

Opinions are welcome!

-Idea
 
_________________
 
I use Windows Commander since 1999 and I have an idea
_________________
_________________
 

User avatar
Idea
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 12
Joined: 2012-06-23, 17:32 UTC

Post by *Idea » 2012-07-19, 16:47 UTC

Log in and vote, please. :)
_________________
 
I use Windows Commander since 1999 and I have an idea
_________________
_________________
 

User avatar
MaxX
Power Member
Power Member
Posts: 638
Joined: 2012-03-23, 18:15 UTC
Location: Earth

Post by *MaxX » 2012-07-19, 17:45 UTC

2Idea
If you don't like this option - ask Ghisler to make it switchable.
I like this function as it is now, and it is very useful for me. I don't want it to be removed or disabled by default.

User avatar
Idea
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 12
Joined: 2012-06-23, 17:32 UTC

Post by *Idea » 2012-07-20, 10:15 UTC

Nobody want to remove :o Opponently, extend it even for 1 file transfer :wink:
_________________
 
I use Windows Commander since 1999 and I have an idea
_________________
_________________
 

HAL 9000
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 384
Joined: 2007-09-10, 13:05 UTC

Post by *HAL 9000 » 2012-10-30, 22:23 UTC

Removing this totally (via an option of course) would be less eye & system tiring I think.

User avatar
white
Power Member
Power Member
Posts: 2020
Joined: 2003-11-19, 08:16 UTC
Location: Netherlands

Post by *white » 2012-10-30, 23:20 UTC

Message from moderator

Moved to Polls forum.

White (moderator)

User avatar
Idea
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 12
Joined: 2012-06-23, 17:32 UTC

Post by *Idea » 2012-10-31, 15:09 UTC

Thanks for the move, and please vote!
_________________
 
I use Windows Commander since 1999 and I have an idea
_________________
_________________
 

User avatar
Idea
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 12
Joined: 2012-06-23, 17:32 UTC

Post by *Idea » 2013-05-05, 16:31 UTC

Vote result is univocal! :)
_________________
 
I use Windows Commander since 1999 and I have an idea
_________________
_________________
 

User avatar
ghisler(Author)
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 36425
Joined: 2003-02-04, 09:46 UTC
Location: Switzerland
Contact:

Post by *ghisler(Author) » 2013-05-06, 13:39 UTC

For your information, this has been added on February 10 for TC 8.5.
Author of Total Commander
http://www.ghisler.com

User avatar
KC_
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 88
Joined: 2012-03-07, 01:39 UTC

Post by *KC_ » 2013-05-06, 17:12 UTC

Thanks. Looking forward to a public beta.

I'm really excited about the new version.

Cheers
# 251045
Total Commander 9.5

Please sign up to Dropbox using this link https://db.tt/IFywss4M

So we both get extra/bonus space. Thanks!

User avatar
Idea
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 12
Joined: 2012-06-23, 17:32 UTC

Post by *Idea » 2013-05-14, 19:00 UTC

Good to hear that. 8)
_________________
 
I use Windows Commander since 1999 and I have an idea
_________________
_________________
 

Post Reply