Talk:AutoHotkey: Automatic directory-specific configuration / actions

From TotalcmdWiki
Revision as of 12:21, 23 March 2011 by White (talk | contribs) (Signature added)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

Producing workarounds means a good solutions becomes unlikely - think about it! --Lefteous 01:35, 27 Aug 2005 (EST)

--Hacker 06:03, 27 Aug 2005 (EST)
I did. I prefer working workarounds to elegant unimplemented solutions. ;-) Maybe you should withdraw your plugins and wait for their functionality to be implemented in TC? Think about it!

--Hacker 06:08, 27 Aug 2005 (EST)
Also, maybe Christian should rather spend his time on non-workaroundable issues if the workaround is usable.

The difference between a plugin and this frickelware is that plugins are integrated. As a computer scientist you probably know what "let the frame work" means... And no these workarounds are not usable. We could make a usability test and proof it. --Lefteous 06:24, 27 Aug 2005 (EST)

One more thing - there are some functions in Total Commander which could be removed because there are plugins which do a better job. --Lefteous 06:32, 27 Aug 2005 (EST)

As I wrote on the public forum everything could be done by these scripts - the whole programs. The downside is that the quality of the program really suffers under this frickelware. --Lefteous 13:41, 27 August 2005 (EST)

--Hacker 17:28, 27 Aug 2005 (EST)
I haven't noticed TC behaving worse since I started to use scripts... ;-)
Let's perform a usability test! :-D

What do you mean by "Let's"? That sounds as if you want to help in performing a usability test. Do you really think you are able to do this? --Lefteous 02:52, 1 Sep 2005 (EST)

--Hacker 16:58, 31 Aug 2005 (EST)
No, not at all.
May I suggest you sign your comments? ;-)