Talk:List of unreleased plugins: Difference between revisions

From TotalcmdWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Re:)
m (moved Talk:Unreleased plug-ins to Talk:List of unreleased plugins: Use "List of"-naming convention and use "plugins" instead of "plug-ins".)
 
(13 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 15: Line 15:
What problem?<br>
What problem?<br>
--[[User:Alextp|Alextp]]
--[[User:Alextp|Alextp]]
Why do you mention that only plug-ins are listed which were created frm authors who have access to the forum. This is really unnecessary- Everyone can contribute here. --[[User:Lefteous|Lefteous]] 08:41, 29 Aug 2006 (EST)
== Re: ==
Because this's true: look at funduk's list: are all of these authors have access to ghisler.ch? No at all. And from those who have it, only 1-2 authors have posted their links to this Wiki page.<br>
PS: Please use "+" button on the right of "Edit" button, so your comment will be separated by line<br>
--[[User:Alextp|Alextp]]
== Re: ==
Well don't have access sounds like they are not allowed to register to the forum. Actually they are just too lazy.
( No line has been added when adding a new comment using the + button )
--[[User:Lefteous|Lefteous]] 05:03, 1 Sep 2006 (EST)
== Re: ==
No, "whose who have access" means only "whose ppl who have found time to register on Ghisler.ch". I may correct that sentence, if it sounds not like that.<br>
PS: I pressed "+", typed "Re:" and new line was added.<br>
--[[User:Alextp|Alextp]]
== Re: ==
Corrected to "Only those plug-ins are listed here which authors have found time to register on Wiki and post info here."<br>
--[[User:Alextp|Alextp]]
OK :-) --[[User:Lefteous|Lefteous]] 01:37, 8 Sep 2006 (EST)
== Re: ==
I managed to wiki my list, so I deleted that "disclaimer" you wrote ;)
However, I have some questions to TC community:<br>
1. If there is a full list, is it necessary to have lists for each type? Should we delete the following?
* 3 Packer plug-ins<br>
* 4 File system plug-ins<br>
* 5 Lister plug-ins<br>
* 6 Content plug-ins<br>
2. This section is devoted to unreleased plugins (not released on totalcmd.net and on ghisler.com), but my list consisted of plugins not released on totalcmd.net. So there could still be plugins that are released on ghisler.com and NOT on totalcmd.net. Could anyone check that or is it unnecessary? I personally removed Exif and WebDav plugins from the list as they were released, but these were the easiest to check.<br>
--[[User:XPEHOPE3KA|XPEHOPE3KA]]
2'''XPEHOPE3KA'''
What is the proper way to submit more plugins?
wlx Jad 1.0.0.23 Pavel Kubal [http://mraky.net/ Домашняя страница] [http://mraky.net/java/tc_plugin.zip От автора] I use jad.wlx to view Java class files.

Latest revision as of 19:23, 5 October 2009

"Only those plug-ins are listed which authors have access to this Wiki" Everyone with a ghisler.ch account is allowed write here. --Lefteous 06:40, 21 Aug 2006 (EST)

Re:

2Lefteous
Yes right.
"Access to Wiki" means access to ghisler.ch forum, of course.
--Alextp

I don't understand the problem. Every spam bot is able to create a forum account as you can see everyday. --Lefteous 17:04, 24 Aug 2006 (EST)

Re:

2Lefteous
What problem?
--Alextp

Why do you mention that only plug-ins are listed which were created frm authors who have access to the forum. This is really unnecessary- Everyone can contribute here. --Lefteous 08:41, 29 Aug 2006 (EST)

Re:

Because this's true: look at funduk's list: are all of these authors have access to ghisler.ch? No at all. And from those who have it, only 1-2 authors have posted their links to this Wiki page.
PS: Please use "+" button on the right of "Edit" button, so your comment will be separated by line
--Alextp


Re:

Well don't have access sounds like they are not allowed to register to the forum. Actually they are just too lazy. ( No line has been added when adding a new comment using the + button ) --Lefteous 05:03, 1 Sep 2006 (EST)

Re:

No, "whose who have access" means only "whose ppl who have found time to register on Ghisler.ch". I may correct that sentence, if it sounds not like that.
PS: I pressed "+", typed "Re:" and new line was added.
--Alextp

Re:

Corrected to "Only those plug-ins are listed here which authors have found time to register on Wiki and post info here."
--Alextp

OK :-) --Lefteous 01:37, 8 Sep 2006 (EST)

Re:

I managed to wiki my list, so I deleted that "disclaimer" you wrote ;)

However, I have some questions to TC community:
1. If there is a full list, is it necessary to have lists for each type? Should we delete the following?

  • 3 Packer plug-ins
  • 4 File system plug-ins
  • 5 Lister plug-ins
  • 6 Content plug-ins

2. This section is devoted to unreleased plugins (not released on totalcmd.net and on ghisler.com), but my list consisted of plugins not released on totalcmd.net. So there could still be plugins that are released on ghisler.com and NOT on totalcmd.net. Could anyone check that or is it unnecessary? I personally removed Exif and WebDav plugins from the list as they were released, but these were the easiest to check.
--XPEHOPE3KA

2XPEHOPE3KA What is the proper way to submit more plugins?

wlx Jad 1.0.0.23 Pavel Kubal Домашняя страница От автора I use jad.wlx to view Java class files.