7Zip Plugin Continued ...
Moderators: Hacker, petermad, Stefan2, white
- theosdikaios
- Senior Member
- Posts: 228
- Joined: 2006-02-04, 13:02 UTC
2Duny
Hint: The "Encrypt" checkbox of Total Commanders pack dialog is greyed. Since Total Commander version x.xx (I dunno) a packer plugin can use this ability too. See TotalSQX plugin.
Hint: The "Encrypt" checkbox of Total Commanders pack dialog is greyed. Since Total Commander version x.xx (I dunno) a packer plugin can use this ability too. See TotalSQX plugin.
"Since there are many things which have never happened and never will happen,
and which nevertheless are clearly conceivable, and imply no contradiction,
how can one say they are absolutely impossible?" Leibniz
and which nevertheless are clearly conceivable, and imply no contradiction,
how can one say they are absolutely impossible?" Leibniz
crypt password with another password?jjk wrote:Hi Dunny
Thanks for your job.
Now I'd like to have an other feature : when I check on the "Keep using the password more than once" checkbox, the choosen pwd is written clearly in 7zip.ini, which is not very confidential.
Could you crypt this password ?
TIA
2theosdikaios
You are right, I was using TC 7.50b12. If I use TC 7.04a I see the same 00.00.1980 00:00 date and time as BH reports.
You are right, I was using TC 7.50b12. If I use TC 7.04a I see the same 00.00.1980 00:00 date and time as BH reports.
License #524 (1994)
Danish Total Commander Translator
TC 11.50b4 32+64bit on Win XP 32bit & Win 7, 8.1 & 10 (22H2) 64bit, 'Everything' 1.5.0.1383a
TC 3.60b4 on Android 6, 13 & 14
TC Extended Menus | TC Languagebar | TC Dark Help | PHSM-Calendar
Danish Total Commander Translator
TC 11.50b4 32+64bit on Win XP 32bit & Win 7, 8.1 & 10 (22H2) 64bit, 'Everything' 1.5.0.1383a
TC 3.60b4 on Android 6, 13 & 14
TC Extended Menus | TC Languagebar | TC Dark Help | PHSM-Calendar
AndyM wrote:Hi Duny,
thanks for adding the sfx-option.
Deleting of files and folders works well with V0.6.3 .
Some other small bugs:
- If the archive contains files with a length of 0 bytes Total Commander crashes with an access violation when extracting these files.
- If you create a solid archive containing files with an exe-extension the archive will contain several streams instead of 1.
Additions:
1. 0-Byte-files: With V0.6.4 you can extract 0-byte-files, if the archive was created with 7zip-manager. But if you use your plugin for packing there's still the access violation.
2. solid streams: This issue is also evident, if you use 7Zip-Manager V4.65 for packing a solid archive!
No, with an algorithm that only the app knows. Yes I know that in this case it would not be very secure, but I prefer a bad security than not at all. Because currently, anybody can know easily the password used in every crypted .7z simply reading the 7zip.ini.Duny wrote:crypt password with another password?jjk wrote:Hi Dunny
Thanks for your job.
Now I'd like to have an other feature : when I check on the "Keep using the password more than once" checkbox, the choosen pwd is written clearly in 7zip.ini, which is not very confidential.
Could you crypt this password ?
TIA
It seems to me that there are means to crypt internally some text with an internal algorithm, then to use the reciproque alogorithm to decrypt the text and for example use it as keycode for another crypting process.
- theosdikaios
- Senior Member
- Posts: 228
- Joined: 2006-02-04, 13:02 UTC
i.e. "Put this file attributes into archive", if not then this attribute is not stored. E.g. see the discussion about "date" above.Can somebody please tell me what "File attributes to store then packing" means?
"Since there are many things which have never happened and never will happen,
and which nevertheless are clearly conceivable, and imply no contradiction,
how can one say they are absolutely impossible?" Leibniz
and which nevertheless are clearly conceivable, and imply no contradiction,
how can one say they are absolutely impossible?" Leibniz
2DRP535
"File attributes to store when packing" - there's a typo.
http://ghisler.ch/board/viewtopic.php?p=164764#164764
I guess I should have been:"File attributes to store then packing"
"File attributes to store when packing" - there's a typo.
There is also a kind of typo there:Also, I assume that selecting "solid" as the "Solid Block size" will yield the smallest archive size. Is that correct?
http://ghisler.ch/board/viewtopic.php?p=164764#164764
License #524 (1994)
Danish Total Commander Translator
TC 11.50b4 32+64bit on Win XP 32bit & Win 7, 8.1 & 10 (22H2) 64bit, 'Everything' 1.5.0.1383a
TC 3.60b4 on Android 6, 13 & 14
TC Extended Menus | TC Languagebar | TC Dark Help | PHSM-Calendar
Danish Total Commander Translator
TC 11.50b4 32+64bit on Win XP 32bit & Win 7, 8.1 & 10 (22H2) 64bit, 'Everything' 1.5.0.1383a
TC 3.60b4 on Android 6, 13 & 14
TC Extended Menus | TC Languagebar | TC Dark Help | PHSM-Calendar
Okay, so it means that only files with the checked attributes will be included in the archive. So for ALL files to be included as the default, then all four boxes need to be checked?
If that is the case, then a much better wording would simply be "Include files with the following attributes" and then have the four check boxes underneath.
If that is the case, then a much better wording would simply be "Include files with the following attributes" and then have the four check boxes underneath.
Yes, I saw that but I was rather referring to the implementation of the setting rather than its layout or presentation in the plug-in dialog.petermad wrote:There is also a kind of typo there:
http://ghisler.ch/board/viewtopic.php?p=164764#164764
- theosdikaios
- Senior Member
- Posts: 228
- Joined: 2006-02-04, 13:02 UTC
Nope. All files will be packed but the unchecked attributes will be not. Only the attributes but not the files will be removed.it means that only files with the checked attributes will be included in the archive.
"Since there are many things which have never happened and never will happen,
and which nevertheless are clearly conceivable, and imply no contradiction,
how can one say they are absolutely impossible?" Leibniz
and which nevertheless are clearly conceivable, and imply no contradiction,
how can one say they are absolutely impossible?" Leibniz