I have a Logitech mouse in which you can define the function of the middle button. I have set it to work as double-click. What would happen if i press it on a dir? Will it act as a doubleclick or it will do the task you describe? Personally, i would like it to remain as a doubleclick.Lucas_C wrote:Does middle-click on a directory (or packed file) open it in a new tab?
I need your help for tabbed browsing!
Moderators: Hacker, petermad, Stefan2, white
- Wanderer -
¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
Normally using latest TC on:
x32: WinXPx32 SP3 (very rarely nowadays).
x64: Clients/Servers - Win10/Win11 and Win2K16 to Win2K22, mainly Win10 though.
¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
Normally using latest TC on:
x32: WinXPx32 SP3 (very rarely nowadays).
x64: Clients/Servers - Win10/Win11 and Win2K16 to Win2K22, mainly Win10 though.
- CADweazle
- Senior Member
- Posts: 297
- Joined: 2003-04-03, 09:10 UTC
- Location: Freiburg i.Br. Deutschland
YES SIR!!!Anything else that I should add?





Greetings,
Cheer up, Karl
I really like this suggestion. For a current project, I am on the verge of writing an EXE to do what I call "Broadcast" file copying. One source list and several different destination folders, each folder to get a full set from the source list.And - what about copying one file to selected dir's in different destination-TAB's?
Perhaps TC 6 might incorporate something like that?
Perhaps with "Named Tab Sets", I could keep groups of target folders ready to receive my broadcast?
Perhaps:
cm_CopyToAllDestinationTabs
Licensed, Mouse-Centric, moving (slowly) toward Touch-centric
I like the Idea of Tab-Groups. This could be easaly add to the Ctrl-D Menu and managed like subdirs in this menu (I allready suggested that in the german board http://www.ghisler.ch/board/viewtopic.php?p=8442#8442):
You could add a new Tabgroup the way you're adding a new subdir. It would not be representet as an subdir but all commands in this "subdir" would be executed one after another (like a batch-file or a macro if you want so).
ex:
Real content of the subdir:
With Ctrl-D shown content:
(with the option 'save target tab')
This couldn't be only used for organizing Tabgroups but would also represent a kind of macro-ability to the TC!
[dreaming]and you are able to use all batch-commands[/dreaming]
You could add a new Tabgroup the way you're adding a new subdir. It would not be representet as an subdir but all commands in this "subdir" would be executed one after another (like a batch-file or a macro if you want so).
ex:
Real content of the subdir:
Code: Select all
cm_NewLeftTab cd c:\dir1\lala\
cm_CloseAllRightTabs
cm_NewRightTab cd d:\dir2\lolo\
cm_New_RightTab cm_OpenDesktop
Code: Select all
open tab-group
-
{add/remove} current tab
add complete tab-set
This couldn't be only used for organizing Tabgroups but would also represent a kind of macro-ability to the TC!
[dreaming]and you are able to use all batch-commands[/dreaming]

[face=courier]On 23-06-2003 10:41:32 +0000 ghisler(Author) wrote:
[^Y]
g> Tab1: Source1 and Target1
g> Tab2: Source2 and Target2
g> Now the user needs to copy a file from Source1 to Target2.
g> There is no easy way to do this, except for manually going
g> from Target1 to Target2!
You won't belive, Christian, I'll just press "Alt"+"<-/or/->" being in "Tab2" - "Source1" should be somewhere in a History =). And if it would be necessary, I'll just open "Tab3: Source1 and Target2" and will work with three "tabs". The scheme you implemented is substitution of Panel History list, actually. If you make it saveable you can get almost the same result, IMHO.
g> With tabs per panel, it's easy: Just press Ctrl+Tab in
g> the target window!
Well, and if I want to change destination panel or both target and destination? Is it still so easy? %) But with double paneled scheme you can make it with one KBD hit.
Christian, I don't want to say the scheme you implement is the bad one. I just want you to understand it is only one of two (or even several) possible, all with own unlike signs. So if you implement both, user could chouse the most appropriate one for each.
g> Switching between multiple search results is possible,
g> although they are not saved when TC is closed
So you run each Search process in separate thread?
g> middle click (yes, with the wheel button) on a tab
g> closes it
Hm, I already assign it to "Enter" via my mouse software %). So how it would work with Commander now?
g> tabs can be always on, or only when there is more than
g> one
Is it possible to make them always off?
g> Anything else that I should add?
Double paneled tubs with sorting order and separator position saving in each one, of course.[/face]
[^Y]
g> Tab1: Source1 and Target1
g> Tab2: Source2 and Target2
g> Now the user needs to copy a file from Source1 to Target2.
g> There is no easy way to do this, except for manually going
g> from Target1 to Target2!
You won't belive, Christian, I'll just press "Alt"+"<-/or/->" being in "Tab2" - "Source1" should be somewhere in a History =). And if it would be necessary, I'll just open "Tab3: Source1 and Target2" and will work with three "tabs". The scheme you implemented is substitution of Panel History list, actually. If you make it saveable you can get almost the same result, IMHO.
g> With tabs per panel, it's easy: Just press Ctrl+Tab in
g> the target window!
Well, and if I want to change destination panel or both target and destination? Is it still so easy? %) But with double paneled scheme you can make it with one KBD hit.
Christian, I don't want to say the scheme you implement is the bad one. I just want you to understand it is only one of two (or even several) possible, all with own unlike signs. So if you implement both, user could chouse the most appropriate one for each.
g> Switching between multiple search results is possible,
g> although they are not saved when TC is closed
So you run each Search process in separate thread?
g> middle click (yes, with the wheel button) on a tab
g> closes it
Hm, I already assign it to "Enter" via my mouse software %). So how it would work with Commander now?
g> tabs can be always on, or only when there is more than
g> one
Is it possible to make them always off?
g> Anything else that I should add?
Double paneled tubs with sorting order and separator position saving in each one, of course.[/face]
[face=courier]The Protoss do NOT run from their enemies.
It is here, that we shall make our stand.[/face]
It is here, that we shall make our stand.[/face]
I like this idea of using -Alt- for the "alternate" (target) window.Hacker wrote:Source: Next tab (preferably Ctrl-Tab)
Source: Previous Tab (preferably Ctrl-Shift-Tab)
Target: Next tab (preferably Ctrl-Alt-Tab)
Target: Previous Tab (preferably Ctrl-Alt-Shift-Tab)
I don't see the relevance of having a Target: Close Tab. But anyway. Also, I'm not sure I like the choice of Shift-Tab for a shortcut for this. What about Ctrl-* (not the keypad *, of course)?Hacker wrote:New Tab (preferably Shift-Tab)
Source: Close Tab (for instance Ctrl-W)
Target: Close Tab (for instance Ctrl-Shift-W)
Nice idea, but consider that there are some localized keyboards (like the Italian ones) that miss the ` key. Maybe Ctrl-+ and Ctrl-Alt-+ (or = instead of + for easier access)? (I mean the standard +, not the keypad one, of course)Hacker wrote:Open directory under cursor in new tab could be Ctrl-` for source panel and Ctrl-Alt-` for target panel (wonder what Black Dog's going to say)...
[face=courier]On 23-06-2003 10:41:32 +0000 ghisler(Author) wrote:
g> Now the user needs to copy a file from Source1 to Target2.
g> There is no easy way to do this, except for manually going
g> from Target1 to Target2!
Actually, there is - d&d :). I do hope it would be supported between "tubs"...[/face]
g> Now the user needs to copy a file from Source1 to Target2.
g> There is no easy way to do this, except for manually going
g> from Target1 to Target2!
Actually, there is - d&d :). I do hope it would be supported between "tubs"...[/face]
[face=courier]The Protoss do NOT run from their enemies.
It is here, that we shall make our stand.[/face]
It is here, that we shall make our stand.[/face]
I'm hoping for flexibility in tab placement. Though the natural locations for the tab controls might be toward the top and bottom of the TC window (I greatly prefer a location beneath the file panes but above the commandline), but what about on the left and right?
Would that be desirable to anyone?
I have more horizontal screen space than vertical screen space. so tabs on the left and right make good sense to me, making efficient use of my monitor.
Would that be desirable to anyone?
I have more horizontal screen space than vertical screen space. so tabs on the left and right make good sense to me, making efficient use of my monitor.
Licensed, Mouse-Centric, moving (slowly) toward Touch-centric
- pdavit
- Power Member
- Posts: 1529
- Joined: 2003-02-05, 21:41 UTC
- Location: Kavala -> Greece -> Europe -> Earth -> Solar System -> Milky Way -> Space
- Contact:
That would be really useful and I do vote for this feature! It would be extremely useful in network environments as in my case I frequently need to update data on remote machines under the Documents & Settings folder.CADweazle wrote:And - what about copying one file to selected dir's in different destination-TAB's?
"My only reason for still using M$ Window$ as an OS is the existence of Total Commander!"
Christian Ghisler Rules!!!
Christian Ghisler Rules!!!
I would like to add that adding tabs seems like a nice addition, but as per my suggestion, I would also like to see different background colors for active and inactive sides, for example you have the left pane selected it's black background with yellow text, and the inactive side may have a silver background with black text... this way you would know what side is active easier than the subtle shift in the blue bar at the top of the pane.
bheagle
Yes, it is extreamly useful; but extreamly dangerous too! So I think it should be only implemented as an optional Checkbox in the copy-dialog.pdavit wrote:That would be really useful and I do vote for this feature!CADweazle wrote:And - what about copying one file to selected dir's in different destination-TAB's?
- CADweazle
- Senior Member
- Posts: 297
- Joined: 2003-04-03, 09:10 UTC
- Location: Freiburg i.Br. Deutschland
Actually this would be my usage: 5 Metaframe-Servers updated at the same time! Would be .... GREAT.pdavit wrote:It would be extremely useful in network environments...
SighJonas wrote:Yes, it is extreamly useful; but extreamly dangerous too!

As always it should be configurable with a warning hint like: "Bold user beware..."



Greetings,
Cheer up, Karl
to Black Dog
Yeah,it's like aut-hiding the taskbar.It appears only if you hover the mouse over the bottom part of the screen.So he meant,show the panel with tabs only when there's at least one... logical,isnt it?g> tabs can be always on, or only when there is more than
g> one
Is it possible to make them always off?
What do you think about the implementation of tabs in Opera? Tab buttons can be visible or invisible, but the tab menu (Ctrl+Tab) is always functional. Everone could pick an individual configuration.norfie wrote:IMO nobody needs tabs.![]()
Tabs are only a (IMO complicated, space wasting) visual representation of temporary directory hotlist. Why we should choose a so complicated solution like tabs? KISS principle!
see also
http://www.ghisler.ch/board/viewtopic.php?p=8912#8912
Last edited by Lefteous on 2003-06-24, 07:52 UTC, edited 1 time in total.