DarkCryptTC - Total Commander now is the best encryptor!!!
Moderators: Hacker, petermad, Stefan2, white
- alexanderwdark
- Senior Member
- Posts: 270
- Joined: 2008-04-14, 07:20 UTC
- Location: Russia
- Contact:
Nice additionalexanderwdark wrote:Full encryption key You can view by right-clicking on disk button, then hex-viewer will be shown;
Suggestion:
1. Move [x] Show encryption key option under Password box will make it more recognizable.
2. Change its caption to Show password
3. When this option is checked, no need for password confirmation (like Winrar does)
waiting for fixing auto language switch

- alexanderwdark
- Senior Member
- Posts: 270
- Joined: 2008-04-14, 07:20 UTC
- Location: Russia
- Contact:
ts4242 wrote:Nice additionalexanderwdark wrote:Full encryption key You can view by right-clicking on disk button, then hex-viewer will be shown;
Suggestion:
1. Move [x] Show encryption key option under Password box will make it more recognizable.
2. Change its caption to Show password
3. When this option is checked, no need for password confirmation (like Winrar does)
waiting for fixing auto language switch
2. Caption changed to reccomended
3. Winrar-like non confirmation if key showed
4. MS-Richedit control now must'nt do autokeyboard
New build
- alexanderwdark
- Senior Member
- Posts: 270
- Joined: 2008-04-14, 07:20 UTC
- Location: Russia
- Contact:
- alexanderwdark
- Senior Member
- Posts: 270
- Joined: 2008-04-14, 07:20 UTC
- Location: Russia
- Contact:
Nigurrath wrote:the exe file into the distribution is reported my mcafee as malware. It is not surely but the result is that the file is deleted and I cannot install the plugin.
It's compressed with UPACK, free and one of the best compressors.
Please, send this files to McAfee. Other AV-tools works correctly and there are no problems. Best antiviruses, such as DrWeb, Kaspersky free of such bugs in their bases and av-engines.
You can switch av monitor off before installing and after it turn it on. Or You can add file to exclusions.
Last edited by alexanderwdark on 2008-04-21, 15:36 UTC, edited 1 time in total.
Scan result for the latest darkcryptrtc.WCX version
Scan result for xdc.exe
2alexanderwdark
Do you have any explanation?
Scan result for xdc.exe
2alexanderwdark
Do you have any explanation?
- alexanderwdark
- Senior Member
- Posts: 270
- Joined: 2008-04-14, 07:20 UTC
- Location: Russia
- Contact:
YES!ts4242 wrote:Scan result for the latest darkcryptrtc.WCX version
Scan result for xdc.exe
2alexanderwdark
Do you have any explanation?
Normal antiviruses can depack any packer, but hand-made buggy, such as McAffee can't depack UPK, (WIN)UPACK, etc. and finds just some portions of bytes of PE-header and depack engine...
Check in DrWeb, Kaspesky online check (virus total gives results- that is ok).
This AV's can check correctly and euristics works ok. Some buggy avtivirus use only bytestets and the result you can see - euristics of signature fails...
Use normal, working and correct written antivirus. And send files for this
buggy product autors. They must fix it's bases and av engines. They must add upack PE-packer support. The can do it

P.S. WCX packed by ASPACK, EXE - by UPACK.
This buggy avs can't depack upx-packed PE-files.
Some trojans, viruses uses UPK and has UPK PE Headers.. IF incorrectly written av can't depack PE-file, it checks only signature or use euristics mode, because of it failure can be done. Some av can detect any random virus or by clever "euristics" - mystic virus-type exe.
Pack any file with PE-packer upack and buggy antivirus says You virus, virus...
Upack PE packer
Authors just can't write depacker...
Use russian fine-made antiviruses, such as DrWeb or Kaspersky
You can use build packed by ASPack and UPX...
(Win)Upack not used and antivirus mustn't be in panic

Buggy antiviruses fix - repacked
VirusBaster says as is (good man) - "VirusBuster 4.3.26:9 2008.04.20 Packed/Upack", ClamAV fails with packer too.. - "ClamAV 0.92.1 2008.04.21 PUA.Packed.UPack-2"
And virus total says: packers: UPack
Scan result for xdc.exe with upx packer (not using upack upacker and they are not in panic

2alexanderwdark
this is scan result for first published unpacked xdc.exe F-secure reported it is infected!!!
this is scan result for first published unpacked xdc.exe F-secure reported it is infected!!!
ts4242,
What is also suspicious is that only F-Secure reported it being suspicious!!!
HTH!!!
Roman
F-Secure reported it is suspicious!!!F-secure reported it is infected!!!
What is also suspicious is that only F-Secure reported it being suspicious!!!
HTH!!!
Roman
Mal angenommen, du drückst Strg+F, wählst die FTP-Verbindung (mit gespeichertem Passwort), klickst aber nicht auf Verbinden, sondern fällst tot um.
- alexanderwdark
- Senior Member
- Posts: 270
- Joined: 2008-04-14, 07:20 UTC
- Location: Russia
- Contact:
ts4242 wrote:2alexanderwdark
this is scan result for first published unpacked xdc.exe F-secure reported it is infected!!!
The best words: What is also suspicious is that only F-Secure reported it being suspicious!!!
Some antivirus has good heuristic engine, some antivirus has bad heuristic engine. File writing operations, opening and writing header it can see as viral activity... But what is also iteresting - xdc uses wcx plugin and not make something itself. XDC only can delete file if -d switch applied. F-Secure whants to say: if code is deleting file - it's maybe virus

Superior news:
Very dangerous virus written! See this code:
Code: Select all
program XDC;
{$APPTYPE CONSOLE}
uses
SysUtils;
begin
if (paramstr(3)='d') then begin
FileSetReadOnly(paramstr(2),false);
DeleteFile(paramstr(2));
end;
end.
Compile it by Delphi or other object pascal compiler...
If compiled by Delphi 2007
Panda 9.0.0.4 2008.04.21 Suspicious file, Webwasher-Gateway 6.6.2 2008.04.21 Virus.Win32.FileInfector.gen!90 (suspicious)

If compiled by Delphi 7
F-Secure 6.70.13260.0 2008.04.22 Suspicious:W32/Malware!Gemini, Panda 9.0.0.4 2008.04.21 Suspicious file
F-Secure says - any Delphi 7 code is Suspicious:W32/Malware!Gemini
Webwasher says - any Delphi 2007 code is Virus.Win32.FileInfector.gen!90
And Panda says - any code is Suspicious file

- alexanderwdark
- Senior Member
- Posts: 270
- Joined: 2008-04-14, 07:20 UTC
- Location: Russia
- Contact:
Yes! New release supports multiple files packing!!!Even in a next release, no more than one file ? because it is less practical to pack before encryption.
when I crypt n files simultaneously, I'm asked the password n times, even if I want the same password for each file.

You can pack files to TAR.XDC encrypted archive.
Download it now!
Plugins download page
You need to You use Total Commander 7.03!
Thanx to Ghisler, author of the best file mager, for fast bugfixing!
- ghisler(Author)
- Site Admin
- Posts: 50463
- Joined: 2003-02-04, 09:46 UTC
- Location: Switzerland
- Contact:
2alexanderwdark
Thanks for confirming the fix! Btw, I noticed the bug only when updating my bzip2 plugin recently...
Thanks for confirming the fix! Btw, I noticed the bug only when updating my bzip2 plugin recently...
Author of Total Commander
https://www.ghisler.com
https://www.ghisler.com