sorry, I thought 1.) is what you wanted most.
And as an optional feature that I can have beside the current behaviour you have my vote!

I'm definitivly with you for the implementation of 2, 3, and 4.
Moderators: Hacker, petermad, Stefan2, white
Of course you are right. What I meant is that breadcr. are mainly for going down in your folder hierarchy whatever your starting point is.Lefteous wrote:Not necessarily - you could use breadcrumbs when starting above the current level and still navigate to subdirs with panels when starting from the current dir.But isn't that the main purpose of breadcrumbs?
I like Samuels ideas and I think it would be better to let the starting point be the folder im currently in = the far right and I also think that cone be done without the part I don't like from 1.) what should be shown in the menu:Lefteous wrote:As written before 2 can hardly be implemented without 1.
2LefteousLefteous wrote:Just click on the underlined path parts...As far as I understand you can't use the breadrc. (menu) itself for going up - it least for now.
What is "the desktop breadcrumb menu" ?the desktop breadcrumb menu
Could be activated from "*.*". But in my opinion either navigate in the old way (with file panel) or use menu and push 1 time right button is fine.Lefteous wrote:An idea to solve the additional menu open problem in the current path would a button right to the path which opens the subdirs of the current path. It could be just an arrow down just like the desktop breadcrumb menu.
Are you sure?Hey I understood you this time.