But if per design, why is the tc[ext] working ?
And if it is planned also like that, why is it then not possible in the Custom mode to "replace" the defulat "ext" by the "tc[ext]" ...
Something strange ...
JFI: I'm not claiming, just noticed it, because I had to take over a project.
And, I'm using license TC since version 3 and I would miss it if it would no longer exists ......
That would require unlocking the Name and Ext column, as the name would change as well as the Ext in this case.
Last I inquired about something similiar -- to be able to replace both fields with a new CustomColumn group, Ghisler advised they are required internally for efficient sorting.
*BLINK* TC9 Added WM_COPYDATA and WM_USER queries for scripting.
In such case TC should at least overlap theese columns if their length is almost 0 (currently text is displayed above another text so both are unreadable).
MVV wrote:In such case TC should at least overlap theese columns if their length is almost 0 (currently text is displayed above another text so both are unreadable).
That's another alternative......
Whatever possibilities I have today, it's not properly working
and you'll replace it with your tc.ext then.
