http://ghisler.ch/board/viewtopic.php?p=258586#258586
i'm working with Ghisler's sFTP plugin.
Personally, what I need most in Ghisler's plugin is:
more caching and look-ahead, for much faster directory browsing
more KeepAlive,
easier work with editing files,
slightly better connection error management.
from the description, I don't see if the above items are addresded in the other plugin.
so - what are the differences between the plugins?
different sftp plugins - what are the differences?
Moderators: Hacker, petermad, Stefan2, white
Re: different sftp plugins - what are the differences?
I'm working with SFTP4TC (unsurprisingly)zaffi wrote: i'm working with Ghisler's sFTP plugin.
In SFTP4TC you can enable/disable caching. There is no lookahead (IMHO lookahead is futile).zaffi wrote: Personally, what I need most in Ghisler's plugin is:
more caching and look-ahead, for much faster directory browsing
In SFTP4TC you can configure null packets each n seconds and/or enable tcp keep alive. What "more" is needed?zaffi wrote: more KeepAlive,
What is easier than pressing F4 to edit?zaffi wrote: easier work with editing files,
Maybe, I am not aware of any problems in SFTP4TCzaffi wrote: slightly better connection error management.
If there is something missing or not working, open a ticket at http://sourceforge.net/p/sftp4tc/tickets/zaffi wrote: from the description, I don't see if the above items are addressed in the other plugin.
SFTP4TC is based on PuTTY. The plugins benefits from the many PuTTY features. What I like most:zaffi wrote: so - what are the differences between the plugins?
- all PuTTY sessions are instant available - no double configuration.
- with Pageant (PuTTY authentication agent) I load the keys once (entering the passwords) then I can open PuTTY sessions / SFTP connections without entering passwords, plus the password is not stored somewhere.
Bebbo
Re: different sftp plugins - what are the differences?
And INHO, the reasons against/in favor of read-ahead are nearly the same as the reasons for caching.bebbo wrote:I'm working with SFTP4TC (unsurprisingly)zaffi wrote: i'm working with Ghisler's sFTP plugin.
In SFTP4TC you can enable/disable caching. There is no lookahead (IMHO lookahead is futile).zaffi wrote:Personally, what I need most in Ghisler's plugin is: more caching and look-ahead, for much faster directory browsing
Ghisler's plugin seem to reconnect every once in a while, even though the indicators seem that the session is on (the "ftp transfer pane" at the top of the screen, the color of the sftp-profile at "\\\Secure FTP" folder)bebbo wrote:In SFTP4TC you can configure null packets each n seconds and/or enable tcp keep alive. What "more" is needed?zaffi wrote: more KeepAlive,
(sorry, this is actually OK! i was confused with the olf FTP behavior)bebbo wrote:What is easier than pressing F4 to edit?zaffi wrote:easier work with editing files,
Sometimes Ghisler's plugin is "stuck" in an endless loop trying to connect or reconnect to the server.bebbo wrote:Maybe, I am not aware of any problems in SFTP4TCzaffi wrote:slightly better connection error management.
I don't know on which conditions, and I don't know how to recreate the problem.
But it happens to me twice a month.
ghisler's plugin also use Putty's Pageant (see below).bebbo wrote:SFTP4TC is based on PuTTY. The plugins benefits from the many PuTTY features. What I like most:zaffi wrote:so - what are the differences between the plugins?
- all PuTTY sessions are instant available - no double configuration.
- with Pageant (PuTTY authentication agent) I load the keys once (entering the passwords) then I can open PuTTY sessions / SFTP connections without entering passwords, plus the password is not stored somewhere.
Is there a difference in the implementations?
Image: http://i60.tinypic.com/wl0g0.jpg
Also, in Ghisler's plugin: most upload/download/reconnect operations are performed in the FOREGROUND.
So if I have a slow connection, i have to wait for each operation's dialog to finish (or work on another TC session).