When DPI=96:
https://ibb.co/LxKJs0T
When DPI=120
https://ibb.co/sJYND31
The gap between the objects has almost doubled! But even the original view is very illogical. Buttons should be raised by 2/3 pixels minimum.
P.S.
Also - It is also desirable to make the Parameters field completely unavailable for commands that do not support parameters.
[TC 11.00b2] Improper alignment of new GUI objects in Settings
Moderators: Hacker, petermad, Stefan2, white
[TC 11.00b2] Improper alignment of new GUI objects in Settings
#146217 personal license
- ghisler(Author)
- Site Admin
- Posts: 50386
- Joined: 2003-02-04, 09:46 UTC
- Location: Switzerland
- Contact:
Re: [TC 11.00b2] Improper alignment of new GUI objects in Settings
It's the same as in TC 10.52. Unfortunately these dialog elements are scaled differently between Windows versions, it will never be possible to make them align correctly on all systems with all themes.
Author of Total Commander
https://www.ghisler.com
https://www.ghisler.com
Re: [TC 11.00b2] Improper alignment of new GUI objects in Settings
But probably there has not yet been ANY description of a similar bug, so that the picture in it indicates that these buttons are too high;)
Those - hint - in any case, it is necessary to initially raise these buttons by 2 or 3 pixels.
YES, maybe with different Win.versions on different themes there will be a further vertical divergence, but for some reason it seems to me that no one will write that the buttons "were placed" too high. Vert.Differences for some reason usually go down.
Those - hint - in any case, it is necessary to initially raise these buttons by 2 or 3 pixels.
YES, maybe with different Win.versions on different themes there will be a further vertical divergence, but for some reason it seems to me that no one will write that the buttons "were placed" too high. Vert.Differences for some reason usually go down.
#146217 personal license