I ask out of interest:
Apparently you are still using Tc - a few years later. Have you meanwhile acquired a license from Tc to be able to do this?
Joube
Moderators: Hacker, petermad, Stefan2, white
I ask out of interest:
Apparently you are still using Tc - a few years later. Have you meanwhile acquired a license from Tc to be able to do this?
Moderator message from: white » 2023-11-25, 08:56 UTC
Moved off-topic post from Disable 'standby mode' during background copy to this thread.
{OT] I see that - from time to time - you post direct links into the help. Such links are nice. Is there an easy way to get such links by the user, who is not interested in a deep dive into the structur of the helpfiles (easy: without having a look into the help sources, which, as I know, you had done because of darkhelp, which I by the way would never use...)?petermad wrote: 2023-12-10, 10:21 UTCCode: Select all
hh.exe %COMMANDER_PATH%\TOTALCMD.CHM::dlg_choosecommand.htm hh.exe %COMMANDER_PATH%\TOTALCMD.CHM::dlg_configbuttonbar.htm
Right-click in the help page and select Properties. Then copy the Address (URL) and replace "mk:@MSITStore:" with "hh".JOUBE wrote: 2023-12-10, 15:42 UTC{OT] I see that - from time to time - you post direct links into the help. Such links are nice. Is there an easy way to get such links by the user, who is not interested in a deep dive into the structur of the helpfiles (easy: without having a look into the help sources, which, as I know, you had done because of darkhelp, which I by the way would never use...)?petermad wrote: 2023-12-10, 10:21 UTCCode: Select all
hh.exe %COMMANDER_PATH%\TOTALCMD.CHM::dlg_choosecommand.htm hh.exe %COMMANDER_PATH%\TOTALCMD.CHM::dlg_configbuttonbar.htm
Moderator message from: white » 2023-12-10, 15:54 UTC
Thank you, the same.richardw wrote: 2023-12-24, 17:41 UTC Happy Christmas to Christian Ghisler and everyone on this forum.
Now it is possible without TCFS2 + TCFS2Tools ¯\_(ツ)_/¯With TFCS2 + TCFS2Tools, this has been possible for 13 years.
Why now? This could have been done before (not only on AHK). We are talking about the absence of the need to resort to slower and more voluminous (thirty times) means, especially after so many years.
Why are you asking me?Why now?
We are talking about the number of TC users having AHK already installed compared to the number of users having TCFS2 + Tools already installed.We are talking about the absence of the need to resort to slower and more voluminous (thirty times) means
This is rather a rhetorical question, given my explanation.
How can we talk about it if we don't know it? Moreover, it is more correct to take into account not all AHK users, but only those who use it in combination with TC.Hacker wrote: 2024-01-08, 11:37 UTC We are talking about the number of TC users having AHK already installed compared to the number of users having TCFS2 + Tools already installed.
Considering you started talking about it, I assume this is another rhetorical question.How can we talk about it if we don't know it?
Where? I didn't say a word about comparing the number of users.
Moderator message from: Hacker