[wdx] WinScript Advanced Content Plugin (x86\x64) (new)

[nsp]

@Rygor as said by *Fla$her this is currently not possible as content column/field are only defined as text.
You could try to contact AlexShy in order content Type could be specified additionally or have additional names like contentN contentN1 ...

[Rygor]

2Fla$her
2nsp

Thank you for your answers. I know that there is no such function right now (i've read ReadMe.txt, options.ini and all Scripts, also i've tried int() function in Python to pass integer value). Example with width, height of images is just an example. Also i haven't found any direct contact with author.
So i wrote this message as feature request in the hope that the author will read my message.

[Fla$her]

2nsp, Rygor
Not the case. After a number of ignored wishes 6 years ago, the author completed the development of the plugin and posted the sources. Since then, he has not been engaged in plugins.

[mihail_ms]

Is there by any chance a similar wlx64?

А нет подобного wlx64 ?

[Fla$her]

2mihail_ms
Maybe AnyCmd?

[mihail_ms]

Fla$her
Конечно можно прикрутить к нему консольный вывод текста, для моей простейшей задачи хватает. По расширению файла выдать описание. Но убогий шрифт сильно мелкий...

Of course, you can attach console text output to it, which is enough for my simplest task. Use the file extension to provide a description. But the poor font is very small...

[Fla$her]

You can create a ticket (font name/size, background, edges margin size, and auto wrap).

[nsp]

Is there by any chance a similar wlx64?

This plugin is not maintained anymore. As an alternative i use WDXGuideInLister64 to see my wdx field in a lister.

for 32bit TC, you also have a nice wcx WdxInfoPacker able to create list of wdx information you an then view resulting file....

[Fla$her]

to see my wdx field in a lister.

I doubt the question is about single line fields and not about modified text.
I think the request for x64 is related to this plugin.

Use the file extension to provide a description.

Is a tooltip not suitable instead of a quick view?