Flint wrote:What about number of NTFS streams - I can add this functionality into my NL_Info content plugin as an additional field
This would be great as a first approach!
Flint wrote:But viewing the streams contents cannot be solved with WDX plugin, because content plugin must have a fixed number of fields, so it is not good to show streams contents (the number of streams can be different)
I think so too. A content plugin only should indicate, if there are streams or - more informative - the number of streams (as you've proposed)
Flint wrote:... The only solution is to view, for example, 10 first streams only and show them as fields like "Stream 1", "Stream 2" and so on.
Hmm, would be a solution, if this can't be done by a lister plugin. With the help of "Content Alternative"-addon these (first 10) stream names could be shown even comfortable (each field in a new
row)
Flint wrote:Packer plugin is not a good idea: how in this case one can browse for streams of RAR-archive? It's not possible to select the archive plugin to use...
You are right, I didn't think aboaut this, as I wrote my posting. This would require some functional enhancements in TC. For instance: Handling of every file as a directory, with a "+"-sign next to each file (klick on "+" would open a list with all sub-streams). Or the user gets a small context menu, if he press <ctrl><pgdown>. This context menu could offer all suitable packer plugins.
Flint wrote:Lister plugin is some better because it has possibility of switching to another plugin by the '4' key, so one can place the streams plugin in the very end of the list and view files as usual, and when he needs to view streams he just presses '4' several times to switch to that last plugin. Not very convenient, however, but possible.
I think so too: A lister plugin would be preferable. To press <4> to toggle all suitable plugins wouldn't be unconvenient for me. It's a common operation for most TC-users, I think. (Maybe a filesystem plugins (wfx) would meet the requirements for listing of streams and operating them best?)
Regards, van Dusen