
In the second way only my exe will be improved.
Why do you call this "lazy solution"?
Moderators: Hacker, petermad, Stefan2, white
No, Chris @ AHK didn't want to implement dock command without the proof that it will be useful ?! He asked me to do script prototype. So, even if this script goes well, it will eventually add dock command to the priority list, witch means that it will come after all other things with high priority are implmented. My ETA for this is lets say 1 year.In AHK it's better because in this way AHK will be improved
So ? That is the basic point if I recall..In the second way only my exe will be improved.
Because it will use timer to periodicly check windows and their placement. So it is lazy and lousy comparing to windows calling me any time windows is moved...Why do you call this "lazy solution"?