Therefore, we are in the beta testing phase and should be able to try out a new, modified state of objects!There is a risk of overlapping controls at higher DPI when moving it too far down.
And only after the tests and we do give a conclusion - is there at least some problem with the new positions
of objects on the form, OR there is NO such problem!
Now there is no objective evidence to deny such a possibility - to move GUI-objects. Just assumptions.
Absolutely not. By removing one option from this part of the form, you have "skewed" GUI, if I can describe it in words,Your jumble isn't better than my jumble. With mine, people can at least see where the moved option was.
you have "overloaded" the whole visual volume of this groupbox. And that's why your version appears visually heavy and
difficult to take in... One needs to look closely to discern what's still there.
My version, on the contrary, unloads all the visual tension of the "crowded" objects on the form.
And plus, in a human way it's much more convenient to look at the same type of checkboxes going
one UNDER the OTHER than to "read" them from left to right. And these two options just have similarities
in their application. Therefore, it is more practical to put them one ABOVE the other!
And the phrase that "people can at least see where the moved option was" is generally incomprehensible.
People will not be able to relate in any way to the fact that there used to be something in this "hole",
and now it is somewhere. It is important for them to simply use the functionality that is on the tab X.
And if something was suddenly moved on tab Y, it doesn't matter at all - so where it was _before_ that.
