Calling internal compare from within overwrite dialog

Here you can propose new features, make suggestions etc.

Moderators: Hacker, petermad, Stefan2, white

Post Reply
User avatar
roentgen
Power Member
Power Member
Posts: 757
Joined: 2005-12-03, 19:58 UTC

Calling internal compare from within overwrite dialog

Post by *roentgen »

If an external compare tool is defined, one cannot call the internal compare in such case.
TC for Linux please!
User avatar
m^2
Power Member
Power Member
Posts: 1413
Joined: 2006-07-12, 10:02 UTC
Location: Poland
Contact:

Post by *m^2 »

Agree.
User avatar
SanskritFritz
Power Member
Power Member
Posts: 3693
Joined: 2003-07-24, 09:25 UTC
Location: Budapest, Hungary

Post by *SanskritFritz »

But you have 2 commands:

cm_IntCompareFilesByContent (Use internal compare tool)
cm_CompareFilesByContent (File comparison)
I switched to Linux, bye and thanks for all the fish!
User avatar
roentgen
Power Member
Power Member
Posts: 757
Joined: 2005-12-03, 19:58 UTC

Post by *roentgen »

2SanskritFritz
Not from within overwrite dialog (as the title says) :D
TC for Linux please!
User avatar
StickyNomad
Power Member
Power Member
Posts: 1933
Joined: 2004-01-10, 00:15 UTC
Location: Germany

Post by *StickyNomad »

2roentgen
history.txt wrote:24.11.06 Added: Overwrite dialog: Ctrl+Shift+F3 forces internal compare tool if an external was defined in wincmd.ini
User avatar
roentgen
Power Member
Power Member
Posts: 757
Joined: 2005-12-03, 19:58 UTC

Post by *roentgen »

2StickyNomad
Yep... thanks.
I was talking about the menu that appears when you click "More Options >>". It never occurred to me until now that Ctrl+F3 would work in there, in order to think further at Ctrl+Shift+F3 :D.
TC for Linux please!
User avatar
roentgen
Power Member
Power Member
Posts: 757
Joined: 2005-12-03, 19:58 UTC

Post by *roentgen »

Upon testing, either of the shortcuts calls the external tool. :shock:
Anyone can confirm?
Last edited by roentgen on 2007-01-04, 13:46 UTC, edited 1 time in total.
TC for Linux please!
User avatar
m^2
Power Member
Power Member
Posts: 1413
Joined: 2006-07-12, 10:02 UTC
Location: Poland
Contact:

Post by *m^2 »

Yes.
User avatar
StickyNomad
Power Member
Power Member
Posts: 1933
Joined: 2004-01-10, 00:15 UTC
Location: Germany

Post by *StickyNomad »

2roentgen
Upon testing, either of the shortcuts calls the external tool.
Anyone can confirm?
Hm, I can't confirm that. CTRL+F3 calls the external tool, CTRL+SHIFT+F3 the internal one, just as expected.
User avatar
Stitscher
Power Member
Power Member
Posts: 1058
Joined: 2004-02-17, 12:34 UTC
Location: Hamburg, Germany

Post by *Stitscher »

roentgen wrote:Upon testing, either of the shortcuts calls the external tool. :shock:
Anyone can confirm?
I can confirm also.


Stitscher
User avatar
Lefteous
Power Member
Power Member
Posts: 9536
Joined: 2003-02-09, 01:18 UTC
Location: Germany
Contact:

Post by *Lefteous »

It's no surprise it doesn't work for beta 2 testers. The history entry stickynomad quoted is part of beta 2.5. The addition will also be part of public beta 3 which is planned to be released next week.
User avatar
Stitscher
Power Member
Power Member
Posts: 1058
Joined: 2004-02-17, 12:34 UTC
Location: Hamburg, Germany

Post by *Stitscher »

@Lefteous
Ahh! :mrgreen:

Thanks for the news, StickyNomad. ;)

Stitscher
User avatar
roentgen
Power Member
Power Member
Posts: 757
Joined: 2005-12-03, 19:58 UTC

Post by *roentgen »

Thanks Lefteous :D

I might add here another annoying issue in TC: modifiers have no effect sometimes. Ctrl+Shift+A behaves exactly as Ctrl+A, as long as the former is not assigned to any action, just like Shift isn't pressed at all.

By taking the situation at hand: Ctrl+Shift+F3 should produce no action.

I remember seeing a thread about this issue ... a long time ago, but I can't find it right now and I can't recall the resolution either.
TC for Linux please!
User avatar
StickyNomad
Power Member
Power Member
Posts: 1933
Joined: 2004-01-10, 00:15 UTC
Location: Germany

Post by *StickyNomad »

The history entry stickynomad quoted is part of beta 2.5
:oops: dang! I didn't look close enough. Well, I hope this isn't too tragic, as beta 3 should arrive soon anyway, so: shhhh :wink:
Post Reply