[REQ] Get rid of "Total Commander 32 bit international
Moderators: Hacker, petermad, Stefan2, white
[REQ] Get rid of "Total Commander 32 bit international
version, file manager replacement for Windows" string.
1. In Process Explorer, you aren't able to collapse the description column with Ctrl+Num+ just because of TC's penis enlargement string.
2. Anyway, what is a "file manager replacement", please? Afaik TC is a file manager, not a replacement for a file manager.
3. Where can I get a non-international version, please?
4. Where can I get a non-Windows version, please?
Description: Total Commander
That's it.
Icfu
1. In Process Explorer, you aren't able to collapse the description column with Ctrl+Num+ just because of TC's penis enlargement string.
2. Anyway, what is a "file manager replacement", please? Afaik TC is a file manager, not a replacement for a file manager.
3. Where can I get a non-international version, please?
4. Where can I get a non-Windows version, please?
Description: Total Commander
That's it.
Icfu
This account is for sale
Re: [REQ] Get rid of "Total Commander 32 bit internatio
thats a Description, not what you wroteDescription: Total Commander 32 bit international version, file manager replacement for Windows
how asking the author of prozess explorer to solve it ?
Hoecker sie sind raus!
Re: [REQ] Get rid of "Total Commander 32 bit internatio
Let him fix that - thats the error not the description wich is a description...icfu wrote:1. In Process Explorer, you aren't able to collapse the description column with Ctrl+Num+ just because of TC's penis enlargement string.
Hoecker sie sind raus!
2icfu
Sorry, my anti-Spam filter was activated for your first post
Maybe It will be hard if M$ is the owner of procexp. Or... Maybe Not, if the initial/original author still is the programmer, I don't know.
P.S.:
= Mode ironic, joke, etc. Don't take me in count 
Sorry, my anti-Spam filter was activated for your first post

As a trivial/basic/elemental idea: Why don't suggest to the author of procexp that the text will be truncated? (if it is more longer than X characters, of course)What has PE author to do with penis enlargement string of TC and how could he solve the problem?
Maybe It will be hard if M$ is the owner of procexp. Or... Maybe Not, if the initial/original author still is the programmer, I don't know.
P.S.:


I can read English, but... I write like Tarzan. (sorry)
There is nothing to fix because there is no error. Ctrl+Num+ is a standard feature for the listview control, it's not a special feature of PE.Let him fix that - thats the error not the description wich is a description...
1. I prefer to see the source of a problem fixed, not waste my time requesting workarounds in all applications suffering from this problem.As a trivial/basic/elemental idea: Why don't suggest to the author of procexp that the text will be truncated? (if it is more longer than X characters, of course)
2. It's Sysinternals. Requesting features from Sysinternals is a waste of time.
3. I prefer to see complete information over truncated one.
Just contact the developer of anti-spam filter to create a workaround.Sorry, my anti-Spam filter was activated for your first post

Icfu
This account is for sale