Total Commander

version, file manager replacement for Windows" string.

1. In Process Explorer, you aren't able to collapse the description column with Ctrl+Num+ just because of TC's penis enlargement string.
2. Anyway, what is a "file manager replacement", please? Afaik TC is a file manager, not a replacement for a file manager.
3. Where can I get a non-international version, please?
4. Where can I get a non-Windows version, please?

Description: Total Commander

That's it.

Icfu

Example

IMO these are the ones to be blamed.

Total Commander. The "Swiss knife" at file managers.

Paradoxically the origin of TC is from Switzerland.

Support ++

Description: Total Commander 32 bit international version, file manager replacement for Windows

thats a Description, not what you wrote
how asking the author of prozess explorer to solve it ?

What I wrote? What have I written, please?
What has PE author to do with penis enlargement string of TC and how could he solve the problem?

Icfu

icfu wrote:1. In Process Explorer, you aren't able to collapse the description column with Ctrl+Num+ just because of TC's penis enlargement string.

Let him fix that - thats the error not the description wich is a description...

2icfu
Sorry, my anti-Spam filter was activated for your first post

What has PE author to do with penis enlargement string of TC and how could he solve the problem?

As a trivial/basic/elemental idea: Why don't suggest to the author of procexp that the text will be truncated? (if it is more longer than X characters, of course)
Maybe It will be hard if M$ is the owner of procexp. Or... Maybe Not, if the initial/original author still is the programmer, I don't know.


P.S.: = Mode ironic, joke, etc. Don't take me in count

It's not only ProcessExplorer, when you right click on a file the "Open with" menu also (sometimes) includes this annoying long title.

So it's somewhere stored in TC's executable and I agree it should be shortened

Let him fix that - thats the error not the description wich is a description...

There is nothing to fix because there is no error. Ctrl+Num+ is a standard feature for the listview control, it's not a special feature of PE.

As a trivial/basic/elemental idea: Why don't suggest to the author of procexp that the text will be truncated? (if it is more longer than X characters, of course)

1. I prefer to see the source of a problem fixed, not waste my time requesting workarounds in all applications suffering from this problem.
2. It's Sysinternals. Requesting features from Sysinternals is a waste of time.
3. I prefer to see complete information over truncated one.

Sorry, my anti-Spam filter was activated for your first post

Just contact the developer of anti-spam filter to create a workaround.

Icfu