Copy speed calculation display

English support forum

Moderators: Hacker, petermad, Stefan2, white

Post Reply
User avatar
Hacker
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 13142
Joined: 2003-02-06, 14:56 UTC
Location: Bratislava, Slovakia

Copy speed calculation display

Post by *Hacker »

I tried to copy a large (~600MB) file to another drive, testing CopyHugeBlockSizeOther. I noticed that when specifying 4096 (+/- some KB) as the value, the copy speed isn't always being calculated. Sometimes it is shown, but in about 80% it isn't.
I have AlwaysCopyInBackground=1, copy was from one physical drive (C:) to another (D:), standard F5, Enter; system is W98SE.

Can anyone reproduce this?

TIA
Roman
Last edited by Hacker on 2004-04-21, 09:06 UTC, edited 1 time in total.
IGL
Member
Member
Posts: 179
Joined: 2004-02-26, 10:47 UTC
Location: Poland

Post by *IGL »

I tried to reproduce it, but unfortunately I do not have another harddisk nor partition (well, I have linux partitions, but not readable under Windows).
But I tried to copy to mapped network drive
ini settings:
AlwaysCopyInBackground=1
CopyBlockSize=8192
CopyBlockSizeOther=10240
CopyHugeBlockSize=20224
CopyHugeBlockSizeOther=10240
I have selected "Also use big file copy mode" and I do not use compatibility mode.
My background thread shows the transfer rate when copying from HDD to mapped network drive a file with size of ~649MB.
That is all I can do for know.
:-)
User avatar
Hacker
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 13142
Joined: 2003-02-06, 14:56 UTC
Location: Bratislava, Slovakia

Post by *Hacker »

Could you try selecting CopyHugeBlockSizeOther=4096, as suggested in my first post?
And maybe also CopyHugeBlockSize=4096?

TIA
Roman
IGL
Member
Member
Posts: 179
Joined: 2004-02-26, 10:47 UTC
Location: Poland

Post by *IGL »

Sorry, I mixed-up something, I understood that problem is when values are >= 4096. I don't know why.
Now I fixed that:
CopyBlockSize=4096
CopyBlockSizeOther=4096
CopyHugeBlockSize=4096
CopyHugeBlockSizeOther=4096
But the rusult is tha same. My background thread shows the transfer rate when copying from HDD to mapped network drive a file with size of ~649MB. Copy speed is always calculated only it needs a few seconds to determine the speed. BTW, I use WinXP and TC 6.02. Mapped drive is a novell disk.
:-)
IGL
Member
Member
Posts: 179
Joined: 2004-02-26, 10:47 UTC
Location: Poland

Post by *IGL »

BTW: Have you noticed funny effect when you type drive in parenthesis, eg. (C:) instead of ( C: ) . I made that mistake when typing keyboard shortcut (Ctrl+F8) instead of (Ctrl+F8 ). That's disadvantage of emoticons - we need to be careful :) .
:-)
User avatar
Clo
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 5731
Joined: 2003-12-02, 19:01 UTC
Location: Bordeaux, France
Contact:

Trick-BB

Post by *Clo »

2IGL
That's disadvantage of emoticons - we need to be careful
:)   Hi Chris!
• To avoid such problems, I often use my HTML editor, in which I patched a BB-code profile...
- You may get the soft - if you have not it yet - from:
http://perso.wanadoo.fr/charries/relais/patching.htm >> helios-paquet.zip

:mrgreen:  Kind regards,
Clo
Claude
Last edited by Clo on 2004-03-24, 12:39 UTC, edited 1 time in total.
#31505 Traducteur Français de TC French translator Aide en Français Tutoriels Français English Tutorials
User avatar
Hacker
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 13142
Joined: 2003-02-06, 14:56 UTC
Location: Bratislava, Slovakia

Post by *Hacker »

IGL,
OK, thanks nevertheless. The "problem" isn't always reproducible, just very often. And I tried to find an exact blocksize using which this happens and it was somewhere around 4096, however, TC somehow kept changing the exact values I typed in, ie 3100 to 3076, etc.
Just FYI.

Roman
Mal angenommen, du drückst Strg+F, wählst die FTP-Verbindung (mit gespeichertem Passwort), klickst aber nicht auf Verbinden, sondern fällst tot um.
IGL
Member
Member
Posts: 179
Joined: 2004-02-26, 10:47 UTC
Location: Poland

Post by *IGL »

2Hacker
Please remember that I was copying from HDD to network drive. Maybe HDD to HDD being much faster will reveal the problem again?
Will anybody else try to join us and to perform the test?
:-)
Post Reply