Feature required...
a new command required to swich between file list icon size 16*16 and 32*32 instead of going to Configuration>Font>Symbol size
this will be fine when assign such command to a toolbar button.
Thanks
Feature required...
Moderators: Hacker, petermad, Stefan2, white
Re: Feature required...
ay222 wrote:Feature required...
a new command required to swich between file list icon size 16*16 and 32*32 instead of going to Configuration>Font>Symbol size
this will be fine when assign such command to a toolbar button.
Thanks

It's a good idea, I support it. In addition, do you think that a variable in that command should allow medium sizes (currently, to type in the "Symbol size" field)?
Though isn't recommended, such sizes work {I use actually 18*18 }; 16*16 is often tiny, and 32*32 is really huge...

Clo
#31505 Traducteur Français de T•C French translator Aide en Français Tutoriels Français English Tutorials
2Clo
i test the size you use 18*18 and many other and i wonder how can you use this size the icons seems very ugly and fade in any size than the standard size 16*16 or 32*32
indeed at first i did not believe you but when i return to your tutorial screen shoots i confirmed
ThanksIt's a good idea, I support it
I think adding such variable will complicate it. but instead the command can swich between 16*16, 32*32 and the user defined size if present.do you think that a variable in that command should allow medium sizes (currently, to type in the "Symbol size" field)?
Though isn't recommended, such sizes work {I use actually 18*18 }; 16*16 is often tiny, and 32*32 is really huge...
i test the size you use 18*18 and many other and i wonder how can you use this size the icons seems very ugly and fade in any size than the standard size 16*16 or 32*32
indeed at first i did not believe you but when i return to your tutorial screen shoots i confirmed

Get glasses----
2ay222
Hi!
¤ I use generally home-made or modified icons 32*32 for the file-types. So, they are reduced. You can see a recent sample here, where list icons are 18*18 (reduced from 32*32):
Image: http://perso.wanadoo.fr/charries/relais/dan-character.png
Please, save the pic, display it with a picture-viewer like XnView or so,
zoom-up the list icons enough, and count the pixels...
The original icon for *.bmp 32*32:
Image: http://perso.wanadoo.fr/charries/relais//paint2.ico
This old "Interface" pic in the Tutorial has list icons as... 19*19!
Whether you don't have a HTML version, watch here:
Image: http://perso.wanadoo.fr/charries/relais/main-win.png
...and count the pixels too...
EDIT 1:
A new test using 24*24 size setting:
Image: http://perso.wanadoo.fr/charries/relais/lists-24x24.png
EDIT 2:
And a trick to avoid that the icons touch one another in the list (size: 20*20):
Image: http://perso.wanadoo.fr/charries/relais/no-touch.png
It's explained somewhere in this forum... Just search!
I didn't write that these sizes look nice, but only that works...
Do you want for verify at home (maybe far a bit...)?
Regards,
Clo
Hi!
¤ I use generally home-made or modified icons 32*32 for the file-types. So, they are reduced. You can see a recent sample here, where list icons are 18*18 (reduced from 32*32):
Image: http://perso.wanadoo.fr/charries/relais/dan-character.png
Please, save the pic, display it with a picture-viewer like XnView or so,
zoom-up the list icons enough, and count the pixels...

Image: http://perso.wanadoo.fr/charries/relais//paint2.ico
indeed at first I did not believe you but when i return to your tutorial screen shoots i confirmed

Whether you don't have a HTML version, watch here:
Image: http://perso.wanadoo.fr/charries/relais/main-win.png

EDIT 1:

Image: http://perso.wanadoo.fr/charries/relais/lists-24x24.png
EDIT 2:

Image: http://perso.wanadoo.fr/charries/relais/no-touch.png




Regards,
Clo
#31505 Traducteur Français de T•C French translator Aide en Français Tutoriels Français English Tutorials
2Clo
Hi!
all what you said above and the screen shoots links proves what i said before "icons seems very ugly and fade in any size than the standard size 16*16 or 32*32 "
you know in windows explorer -and many other file manager- switching between Large icons mode and Small icons is very easy so i request this new command to simplify this switching in Total Commander that is all.
Thanks
Hi!
all what you said above and the screen shoots links proves what i said before "icons seems very ugly and fade in any size than the standard size 16*16 or 32*32 "
you know in windows explorer -and many other file manager- switching between Large icons mode and Small icons is very easy so i request this new command to simplify this switching in Total Commander that is all.
Please just give me your address and let me decide if it is far or not.Do you want for verify at home (maybe far a bit...)?

Thanks
Easy!
2ay222
Hello!
¤ I contacted the author of XnView, in order that he updates his softs about 24*24 icons (John's library...).
You have already my city and my country here...
My true full snail address is somewhere at my Web site... So easy to found!
Do I purchase some good bottles?
EDIT:
Finally, a last test (especially dedicated to Ch. Chisler…) :
Image: http://perso.wanadoo.fr/charries/relais/3-versions.png
You can see three versions of a fancy 24*24 original-size icon, quickly drawn in first as BMP >>> ICO >>> In the file-lists…
The screen-shot is a PNG - 24 BPP
The file-list icon-size has been set at 24*24 In the Options for this test…
Indubitably, TC blurs the icons in excess. A temporary solution could be to use raw icons (not smoothed off at all)
Test under Win98SE only currently.
Best regards,
Clo
Hello!
¤ I contacted the author of XnView, in order that he updates his softs about 24*24 icons (John's library...).



EDIT:
Finally, a last test (especially dedicated to Ch. Chisler…) :
Image: http://perso.wanadoo.fr/charries/relais/3-versions.png







Clo
#31505 Traducteur Français de T•C French translator Aide en Français Tutoriels Français English Tutorials