Synch Dirs/Compare by Content: Bug in "compare by conte
Moderators: Hacker, petermad, Stefan2, white
- ghisler(Author)
- Site Admin
- Posts: 50386
- Joined: 2003-02-04, 09:46 UTC
- Location: Switzerland
- Contact:
Seems like your motherboard has a general problem with 4 modules. Does it support 4 GB modules? Maybe 1x 4GB will work?
Author of Total Commander
https://www.ghisler.com
https://www.ghisler.com
Tests made on the following motherboards:
GigaByte GA-P43-ES3G (http://www.gigabyte.com/products/product-page.aspx?pid=2960#ov)
- max 16Gb (4x4Gb) supported
1st set (2x2GB DDR2 DIMMs) - same modules from Kingston (not paired)
- 2x2Gb tested - errors
Zotac GF9300-GE (http://pden.zotac.com/index.php?page=shop.product_details&flypage=flypage_images.tpl&product_id=208&category_id=7&option=com_virtuemart&Itemid=1)
- max 8Gb (2x4Gb) supported
1st set (2x2GB DDR2 DIMMs) - same modules from Kingston (not paired)
- 2x2Gb tested - errors
2nd set (2x1Gb DDR2 DIMMs) - identical (paired) set from Corsair
- 2x1Gb tested - OK
SuperMicro X7SPA-HF-D525 (http://www.supermicro.com/products/motherboard/ATOM/ICH9/X7SPA-HF-D525.cfm)
- max 4Gb (2x2Gb) supported
3rd set (2x2Gb DDR3 SODIMMs) - same modules from Kingston (not paired)
- 2x2Gb tested - errors
- 1st 1x2Gb tested - OK
- 2nd 1x2Gb tested - OK
4th set (2x2Gb DDR3 SODIMMs) - same modules from Samsung (looks like not paired - do not remember)
- 2x2Gb tested - errors
5th set (2x2Gb DDR3 SODIMMs) - identical (paired) set from Corsair
- 2x2Gb tested - errors
GigaByte GA-P43-ES3G (http://www.gigabyte.com/products/product-page.aspx?pid=2960#ov)
- max 16Gb (4x4Gb) supported
1st set (2x2GB DDR2 DIMMs) - same modules from Kingston (not paired)
- 2x2Gb tested - errors
Zotac GF9300-GE (http://pden.zotac.com/index.php?page=shop.product_details&flypage=flypage_images.tpl&product_id=208&category_id=7&option=com_virtuemart&Itemid=1)
- max 8Gb (2x4Gb) supported
1st set (2x2GB DDR2 DIMMs) - same modules from Kingston (not paired)
- 2x2Gb tested - errors
2nd set (2x1Gb DDR2 DIMMs) - identical (paired) set from Corsair
- 2x1Gb tested - OK
SuperMicro X7SPA-HF-D525 (http://www.supermicro.com/products/motherboard/ATOM/ICH9/X7SPA-HF-D525.cfm)
- max 4Gb (2x2Gb) supported
3rd set (2x2Gb DDR3 SODIMMs) - same modules from Kingston (not paired)
- 2x2Gb tested - errors
- 1st 1x2Gb tested - OK
- 2nd 1x2Gb tested - OK
4th set (2x2Gb DDR3 SODIMMs) - same modules from Samsung (looks like not paired - do not remember)
- 2x2Gb tested - errors
5th set (2x2Gb DDR3 SODIMMs) - identical (paired) set from Corsair
- 2x2Gb tested - errors
- ghisler(Author)
- Site Admin
- Posts: 50386
- Joined: 2003-02-04, 09:46 UTC
- Location: Switzerland
- Contact:
Since you use Windows with 32-bit, you cannot access the full 4 GB anyway. Maybe the problem isn't with the RAM, but with the overlap between it and some other device (e.g. a display adapter)?
Author of Total Commander
https://www.ghisler.com
https://www.ghisler.com
Right now I'm running Windows Server 2003 Enterprise - it can access up to 64Gb of RAM, with not more then 4Gb for each process.
Guess in case of overlap with driver the system will crash, isn't it? Also 3 those boards use different display adapters, so the situation should look different, while now it's the same for each MB.
I think that this is a problem with TC memory management somewhere.
The final tests are all made on the SuperMicro's board. The latest findings are:
- Execute-disable bit capability is ENABLED for the CPU thru BIOS. (disabling it causes some tests to run OK, depending on some parameters in BOOT.INI. However, I would prefer to have it enabled)
then, changing parameters in BOOT.INI
- /Execute - test runs OK (My computer - Properties reports 3Gb RAM)
- /Execute /PAE - errors (My computer - Properties reports 4Gb RAM + Physical Address Extension)
Some more results later...
I'm already not sure that this will help, but just for information...
Guess in case of overlap with driver the system will crash, isn't it? Also 3 those boards use different display adapters, so the situation should look different, while now it's the same for each MB.
I think that this is a problem with TC memory management somewhere.
The final tests are all made on the SuperMicro's board. The latest findings are:
- Execute-disable bit capability is ENABLED for the CPU thru BIOS. (disabling it causes some tests to run OK, depending on some parameters in BOOT.INI. However, I would prefer to have it enabled)
then, changing parameters in BOOT.INI
- /Execute - test runs OK (My computer - Properties reports 3Gb RAM)
- /Execute /PAE - errors (My computer - Properties reports 4Gb RAM + Physical Address Extension)
Some more results later...
I'm already not sure that this will help, but just for information...