Beta12 TC leaked

[tosbsas]

thanks

Ruben

[Sir_SiLvA]

2Roy, JackFoo, sas2000, tobsas:

Sorry Guys, but where do u c me barkin' ?`:)
All I wanted 2 point out was that ur behaviour is like
little ones - telling there parents what they want over
and over again, hoping that they so finally get what
they want.

2JackFoo:
1st ur comparison TC with Knifes has ONE BIG
weakness: Knives are prodocued by many firms
<-> TC is only coded (afaik) by Chris.
2nd I didnt tried 2 change ur opinion all I
pointed out was that not every1 shares ur opinion.
3rd Im sorry if I harmed u in any way with my
post as u can guess english is not my mother tongue

2chriss
>an moderated beta-test-subforum where all the problems can be tracked would be a great help
perhaps there allready is one?

2roy
Sorry as posted english is not my mother tongue,
so if u interpreted my post in any kind as "aggressive"
Im sorry if I did u any harm
2nd yes Im no moderator but that doesnt mean that
I must be unable 2 understand Chris point in not
makin an public beta test, must I?

2tobsass
The prob is that TC Beta >10a has been patched to
accept the key in the package so also:
http://ghisler.ch/board/viewtopic.php?p=46115#46115

Just 4 u guys who cant read german I'll translate what
is written in my Signature:

Attention: This post can contain unlabeled Irony, cynism or sarcasm
||
\/

[nevidimka]

Therefore BUG report: a menu bug of tc 6.5 beta12 betas shouldn't be public.

[JP]

Therefore BUG report: a menu bug of tc 6.5 beta12 betas shouldn't be public.

I disagree. It should be public because of this: Small GUI bug: Description on Drives listbox.

[pdavit]

Therefore BUG report: a menu bug of tc 6.5 beta12 betas shouldn't be public.

This is not a bug!

[pdavit]

It should be public because of this: Small GUI bug: Description on Drives listbox.

This is not v6.50beta specific and we are all "guilty" for not finding it earlier not just beta testers.

[Sheepdog]

I disagree. It should be public because of this: Small GUI bug: Description on Drives listbox.

You missed something: This is not actual a bug of any beta but the current Version 6.03a.

That happens sometimes that user find bugs of the current TC version. That is one advantage of this board.

sheepdog

[nevidimka]

2pdavit

This is not a bug!

It's a false positive.

2JP

It should be public because of this:

How about this: all users, which want a public beta test, consider all official versions x.y0 to be a beta version (e.g. official V6.50 will be the next beta version for this users ) . I make no secret: 1 or 2 month later we get a new version V6.51 with fixed errors, which were found in V6.50 by all of us (beta testers).

[Sheepdog]

How about this: all users, which want a public beta test, consider all official versions x.y0 to be a beta version (e.g. official V6.50 will be the next beta version for this users ) . I make no secret: 1 or 2 month later we get a new version V6.51 with fixed errors, which were found in V6.50 by all of us (beta testers).

That's the way M$ develops it's Operating Systems except you never get an update so quick.

sheepdog

[pdavit]

It's a false positive.

What do you mean by "false positive", the task of that menu is pretty obvious.

It might be misleading for some users since it's empty initially following a fresh installation of v6.50 (based on
the fact that no custom columns have been previously configured), but certainly it's not a false positive bug. And
at least the configure menu sub-item should have been an obvious clue as well.

Anyway, I guess it's the price you (not you specifically) pay for messing with leaked betas without knowing the
development history of a feature and before the completion of the help file!

[nevidimka]

2pdavit

What do you mean by "false positive"

This BUG report is a false alarm.

the task of that menu is pretty obvious.

Not for me. I don't know anything about V6.50 (beta) so far.

(not you specifically)

Of course. I don't use this kind of beta software. True love can wait.

[pdavit]

True love can wait.

That's the spirit!