Plugin pages updated on ghisler.com (64-bit)

[Balderstrom]

Here's some icons, all appear to be royalty free -- one set doesn't allow derivative works.

Black White Pearl icons - customization of a download icon from one of the sets.

Download Icon (no deritivate, or commercial usage, author can be contacted)

PSD Download/upload icons

[sztihamer]

There are some nice 16x16 icon set in which there are several images that can be used for a download button.

http://www.iconarchive.com/show/fugue-icons-by-yusuke-kamiyamane.html

[white]

I meant something like this:
http://www.ghisler.com/pluginstest.htm

But with better looking images!

If you remove the border around the image, center the image, underline the text, make the arrow for the combined package somewhat bigger, then it looks quite respectable already. See:
http://img198.imageshack.us/img198/2531/tcplugins6.png

[MaxX]

If you remove the border around the image, center the image, underline the text, make the arrow for the combined package somewhat bigger, then it looks quite respectable already. See:
http://img198.imageshack.us/img198/2531/tcplugins6.png

Just perfect enough! That's what I was talking about.

[ghisler(Author)]

Have a look at my test page now, please:
http://www.ghisler.com/pluginstest.htm

I haven't centered the 32-bit links so it's easier to spot the plugins with 64-bit versions.

[MaxX]

Yep, looks better now.

Suggestion:
Move "release date" from plugin name cell to new column.

[Henrie]

Suggestion:
Move "release date" from plugin name cell to new column.

or make it less important by moving it below the program name and version number like this:
7zip
0.7.6.5a
2011/10/24

[MaxX]

or make it less important by moving it below the program name and version number like this:
7zip
0.7.6.5a
(2011/10/24)

and put into brackets

[karlchen]

Hello, Christian.

The current layout of the Total Commander - Plugins page is much clearer and better than the old one. Implementing Henrie's and MaXx's suggestions (post above) would indeed further improve readability.

Having praised the layout, I would like to mention a flaw affecting the content:
Though the link promises a 32/64-bit download package this link DEB 1.0 2012/05/15 - x32/x64 actually downloads the original 32-bit only version dated 2002.

Cheers,
Karl

[Balderstrom]

Instead of (html for Link items):
<td valign="top" align="left">

Use:
<td style="text-align:center" valign="top" align="left">

[ghisler(Author)]

2karlchen
DEB fixed, thanks! You may need to refresh the page manually.
The date has been moved down, and it's bold only when it's from the same year.

2Balderstrom
What would be the advantage? Doesn't the one I use work in more browsers?

[Balderstrom]

It looks better. And style css will work all the way back to Netscape or IE 5 or before.

[petermad]

Use:
<td style="text-align:center" valign="top" align="left">

Actually <td valign="top" align="center"> will do the same, and it is not correct that css will work in old browsers.

valign="top" and align="center" has been supported by browsers far longer than style="text-align:center".

It is not before IE 5.5 and Netscape 6.0 that the early CSS1 recommendations were reasonably supported.

So Christian is right: not using the style tag will make the html work in more browsers.

[Balderstrom]

For now. Most of those html attributes are deprecated.

[petermad]

Most of those html attributes are deprecated.

That's correct - to comply with html 4 or 5 strict or xhtml you must use:

<td style="text-align: center; vertical-align: top">