Moderators: Hacker, petermad, Stefan2, white
Ok, ok, if you think so, here is the same video in AVI format:roentgen wrote:Come on... you can do better than spreading exe files all over
Hello K.
FRWell, it's not an easy task at all, but if you go to this page, and find there the download link, and save it to your disk, and even manage to install it - then, after all this hard work you will be rewarded with an excellent screen capturing tool that allows capturing the screen video and importing them into several formats.Clo wrote:I would be glad to get the tool to make that…
Again…
FROops, indeed. Clo, could you please split the discussion? (Maybe, even merge with this thread, but I'm not sure...)roentgen wrote:Since we all went offtopic...
Yes I really wonder why the intructions given here are not followed:Since we all went offtopic... what is wrong with the free CamStudio?
CamStudio does not mark mouse clicks, which in some cases is critical.Lefteous wrote:what is wrong with the free CamStudio?
Yes, but the video looks worse than after lossless compression created either by MSU codec or packed in uvScreenCamera EXE-videos.Lefteous wrote:- The used codec is available on all Windows versions
That's indeed a point. There has been a successor o CamStudio but its devleopment been aborted. Maybe there are other programs who can also record the clicks?CamStudio does not mark mouse clicks, which in some cases is critical.
I have never had any quality problems. Just the color depth is limited. Beside that it's lossless.Yes, but the video looks worse than after lossless compression created either by MSU codec or packed in uvScreenCamera EXE-videos.
uvScreenCamera which I mentioned a bit earlier can do this. It can even distinguish and show double and triple clicks and keyboard hotkeys (not in free Russian version though).Lefteous wrote:Maybe there are other programs who can also record the clicks?
No problems, of course. The difference is about the same to the difference between JPG and PNG formats: for screenshots the latter is much better, because JPG by its own nature cannot store correctly thin straight lines and there will always be some noise. I'm just a bit concerned that in some special cases (like the dotted rectangle) it may become significant.Lefteous wrote:I have never had any quality problems.
Well there are many programs which can do this. We need a free program which allows to do all the things we need.uvScreenCamera which I mentioned a bit earlier can do this. It can even distinguish and show double and triple clicks and keyboard hotkeys (not in free Russian version though).
Well the mentioned codec doesn't do quantization.No problems, of course. The difference is about the same to the difference between JPG and PNG formats: for screenshots the latter is much better, because JPG by its own nature cannot store correctly thin straight lines and there will always be some noise. I'm just a bit concerned that in some special cases (like the dotted rectangle) it may become significant.
A new version of what? More details please!Oh, I was not watching for the new versions - a new 3.0 appeared, and in its free versions multiple clicks and keyboard shortcuts are now shown!
What is it and what is it needed for?Lefteous wrote:Well the mentioned codec doesn't do quantization.
Sorry, uvScreenCamera, of course... I edited my previous post now.Lefteous wrote:A new version of what? More details please!
Quantization is performed when saving a picture as JPEG. This leads to the well-known JPEG artifacts which are ok for non-professional pictures but unacceptable for screenshot captures.What is it and what is it needed for?
A want a free version of TC only for citizens of Ouagadougou (Burkina Faso)- a new uvScreenCamera 3.0 appeared, and in its free Russian version multiple clicks and keyboard shortcuts are now shown!
Ah, I see, thanks. So, actually I was talking about it without naming it so.Lefteous wrote:Quantization is performed when saving a picture as JPEG. This leads to the well-known JPEG artifacts which are ok for non-professional pictures but unacceptable for screenshot captures.
Again this is what "Microsoft Video 1" and the optional codec offered by the makers of CamStudio doesn't do and it's really not a good idea to use such a codec.
Lefteous wrote:A want a free version of TC only for citizens of Ouagadougou (Burkina Faso)
So, maybe there are many programs written by Ouagadougouers which are free for all other citizens of this town. 
Ah, yes, background of the status bar! So, fixed in 7.01. 
