Talk:Unified Command system: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
(my answer to Lefteous) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
2) Why did you changed the format to HTML? I wrote in the forum that I don't like this wired mediawiki syntax. | 2) Why did you changed the format to HTML? I wrote in the forum that I don't like this wired mediawiki syntax. | ||
No offense but your intensions seems to be a bit far from building a knowledge base for Total Commander, right? | No offense but your intensions seems to be a bit far from building a knowledge base for Total Commander, right? | ||
-- | |||
1) I only said that I don't run windows on my private PC anymore. That doesn't mean that I don't like/use TC anymore. At work I have to use windows an I would realy be f**** up without TC. So I'm also very interested in improvements in TC. | |||
Yes, I'm also working on an other Commander. But since Krusader is for Linux/KDE and TC for Windows we're not real competitors. On Linux everyone is happy to have an advanced graphical commander and on Windows we're all using TC. I would say we're complement one another. And since TC is, and will remain for the next time, the standart for this kind of software, I would see it as a complement if other people try to write an alternative filemanager for OS where TC doesn't exist. To quote Krusader's project starters here: "if there had been a TC for linux [year 2000] Krusader would't exist". | |||
2) I'm sorry if you don't like my changes. If you like you can revert them, but I thought it would be an improvement since with the wikiML there is a TOC, the sections can be edited separately and the source is easyer to read/extend (ok, the later is subjective again). The next time I'll ask you before, sorry again. | |||
But I really have to object that helping TC wasn't my intension. I think the idea of such a unified command system is a brilliant idea and I would really like to see it implemented in TC. | |||
: Jonas | |||
Revision as of 20:25, 23 May 2005
@Jonas
Two questions: 1) What do you want? You are not interested in Total Commander except for consuming ideas for your own products. 2) Why did you changed the format to HTML? I wrote in the forum that I don't like this wired mediawiki syntax. No offense but your intensions seems to be a bit far from building a knowledge base for Total Commander, right?
--
1) I only said that I don't run windows on my private PC anymore. That doesn't mean that I don't like/use TC anymore. At work I have to use windows an I would realy be f**** up without TC. So I'm also very interested in improvements in TC.
Yes, I'm also working on an other Commander. But since Krusader is for Linux/KDE and TC for Windows we're not real competitors. On Linux everyone is happy to have an advanced graphical commander and on Windows we're all using TC. I would say we're complement one another. And since TC is, and will remain for the next time, the standart for this kind of software, I would see it as a complement if other people try to write an alternative filemanager for OS where TC doesn't exist. To quote Krusader's project starters here: "if there had been a TC for linux [year 2000] Krusader would't exist".
2) I'm sorry if you don't like my changes. If you like you can revert them, but I thought it would be an improvement since with the wikiML there is a TOC, the sections can be edited separately and the source is easyer to read/extend (ok, the later is subjective again). The next time I'll ask you before, sorry again.
But I really have to object that helping TC wasn't my intension. I think the idea of such a unified command system is a brilliant idea and I would really like to see it implemented in TC.
- Jonas